Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #551  
Old 02-02-2015, 12:19 AM
Argh Argh is offline
Planar Protector

Argh's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metallikus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
if we wanted more pixels, we wouldn't voluntarily rotate every mob in class R with ten guilds...which we have for the last year.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #552  
Old 02-02-2015, 12:20 AM
Argh Argh is offline
Planar Protector

Argh's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wycca [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Can anyone say with a straight face that this crap isn't about increasing pixel flows to BDA/Taken/Divinity?
No, didn't you know that the smaller guilds have been pulling the strings in FAP for so long implementing rules weighted in their favor to game the system, even though under every different ruleset (blackouts, mulligans, etc) Taken/BDA/Divinity have gotten more mobs than everyone else?
  #553  
Old 02-02-2015, 12:21 AM
wycca wycca is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metallikus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
if we wanted more pixels, we wouldn't voluntarily rotate every mob in class R with ten guilds...which we have for the last year.
Unless you ALSO want protected, competition-free pixels...then it all fits. Which is also why the entire new proposal also makes complete sense as long as you keep those two things in mind. The heart of your new non-negotiable proposals is, after all, walled gardens to keep the best pixels out of the hands of the smaller guilds, and all 100% competition-free. This is why you aren't in Class C, and instead why you're trying to bully smaller Class R guilds into giving up the best mobs unless they meet your crazy demands.
__________________
First - Monsters & Memories

Argenti | Cobblestone | Animan
  #554  
Old 02-02-2015, 12:25 AM
Swish Swish is offline
Planar Protector

Swish's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,999
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wycca [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Unless you ALSO want protected, competition-free pixels...then it all fits. Which is also why the entire new proposal also makes complete sense as long as you keep those two things in mind. The heart of your new non-negotiable proposals is, after all, walled gardens to keep the best pixels out of the hands of the smaller guilds, and all 100% competition-free. This is why you aren't in Class C, and instead why you're trying to bully smaller Class R guilds into giving up the best mobs unless they meet your crazy demands.
__________________
  #555  
Old 02-02-2015, 02:14 AM
Detoxx Detoxx is offline
Planar Protector

Detoxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,646
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Argh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you can't kill Gore why should be excepted from anything other than Gore? Serious question.
I said this a few pages ago. If they can't kill Gore and Tal, take em off the rotation for those mobs. No reason they cant continue to kill sev, inny, CT, trak, vs, etc. This is why it looks like you guys are trying to snatch more pixels. Dont fault the other guilds because the devs made the hardest mobs have the shittiest loot.
__________________
"All we really lose is one Warrior."
  #556  
Old 02-02-2015, 02:15 AM
Detoxx Detoxx is offline
Planar Protector

Detoxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,646
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metallikus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
if we wanted more pixels, we wouldn't voluntarily rotate every mob in class R with ten guilds...which we have for the last year.
Funny, make it sound like they are your mobs to give away. Sound familiar?
__________________
"All we really lose is one Warrior."
  #557  
Old 02-02-2015, 06:31 AM
towbes towbes is offline
Aviak

towbes's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 96
Default

I finally made it to the end of this thread and I still am not sure what I believe. But thanks for helping me waste an hour of work time!

+1
  #558  
Old 02-02-2015, 07:58 AM
Throndor Throndor is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,277
Default

How can 3/10 guilds disband the rotation? Why don't the other 7 of you just say we have a majority vote that says the rotation is still intact. Failing to continue to abide by previously agreed upon rotation is a violation of the rotation agreement you entered into and as such is grounds for raid suspension per GM reinforced Class R Raid policies.

You're in class R, you chose to be in Class R, there's no other choice but to move up to class C or fade into obscurity. How does 3/10 guild decision to opt-out of the agreed upon raid nuances constitute a ruling vote for the dissolution of the Class R raid rotation entirely, and if the CLass R raid rotation was made to ensure an equitable distribution than how does it justify its continued existence while violating the premise upon which it was created?

If you dissolve the rotation, you dissolve the tier entirely and the server is 100% class C. Otherwise ur just saying you deserve to quarantine 33% of the raid content from TMO and IB to split amongst the three of you, and to hell with the other 7 guilds upon which the rotation was founded to support.
  #559  
Old 02-02-2015, 08:06 AM
Fianna Fianna is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 148
Default

Throndor, while the class system (C,R,FFA) is GM enforced, the rotation in R is not. Basically BDA, Taken and Divinity are saying if the other guilds do not agree, they will just kill everything in R themselves.
  #560  
Old 02-02-2015, 08:13 AM
Culkasi Culkasi is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Europa
Posts: 370
Default

I guess the question is how long TMO/IB would be okay with BDA/Taken potentially taking up 1/9th of all loot "uncontested" versus the 1/6 TMO/IB get - the gap between R and C suddenly became significantly shorter, without making R nearly as cutthroat as C is.

Anyway, its been a very sad week, and I appreciate that to many people on the server its a good laugh - but we have collectively worked very hard for this in the past year, and like anything good, its sad to see it dissolve, for whatever reason, and see much of the hard work put into building relationships and making it work be tossed aside because we can't find a common ground.
__________________
Culkasi Lonelywolf
Officer in Europa
https://www.europaguild.eu/forum/
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.