Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 02-02-2015, 01:23 PM
kaev kaev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,909
Default

Yumyums & Rotwein was definitely the most fun duo
__________________
crabby old man playing 4000 year old goblin sim
  #42  
Old 02-02-2015, 01:25 PM
maskedmelon maskedmelon is offline
Planar Protector

maskedmelon's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: not far from here
Posts: 5,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erydan Ouragan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Let's not exaggerate. I play a paladin.

Our survivability isn't huge. We only have high hp/ac, healing, 3 stuns, root and LoH. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am inclined to agree. Although I find plenty of necros keen on the idea, I often find myself wondering what they get out of it ^^ paladins do not have SU here and are not the bane of all undead as many think. Sure we can spam our crappy nukes between attacks if Need to burn something more quickly and we've a slow enough weapon, but it still isn't fast and that mana is more efficiently spent on heals unless you have poor AC or something.

I am more than happy to take this duo opportunity when available though. It really is a lot of fun and very interesting from an RP perspective. ^^
  #43  
Old 02-02-2015, 01:34 PM
Bodybagger Bodybagger is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am inclined to agree. Although I find plenty of necros keen on the idea, I often find myself wondering what they get out of it ^^ paladins do not have SU here and are not the bane of all undead as many think. Sure we can spam our crappy nukes between attacks if Need to burn something more quickly and we've a slow enough weapon, but it still isn't fast and that mana is more efficiently spent on heals unless you have poor AC or something.

I am more than happy to take this duo opportunity when available though. It really is a lot of fun and very interesting from an RP perspective. ^^
makes no sense RP wise lol... roleplay wise even a shaman with Paladin is questionable...

necro/sk/sham are innately evil classes... barb is only sham not evil, they worship tribunal so could play with pal I suppose... though tribunal is more dark knight rises justice while paladin is Dudley doright...

druid and sham makes pretty good sense RP wise... if rangers ever got proper warrior stats they'd be great too. There aren't any class combinations that can't be fun duo though... because duo is engaging and sometimes stupid fun gameplay. I would say a pure healer/tank combo is about the worst possible duo though, save for that all you need is a few dps and oyu have a solid group.... being a cleric and warrior duo would suck if you didn't look for dps'ers.
Last edited by Bodybagger; 02-02-2015 at 01:37 PM..
  #44  
Old 02-02-2015, 01:45 PM
Burrito Burrito is offline
Sarnak

Burrito's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 424
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bodybagger [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
makes no sense RP wise lol... roleplay wise even a shaman with Paladin is questionable...

necro/sk/sham are innately evil classes... barb is only sham not evil, they worship tribunal so could play with pal I suppose... though tribunal is more dark knight rises justice while paladin is Dudley doright...

druid and sham makes pretty good sense RP wise... if rangers ever got proper warrior stats they'd be great too.
As for the roleplay aspect- maybe if the Paladin only play lawful douchebag and Chad's everyone by being the embodiment of Mithanial Marr

What about paladins of Karana man, or maybe a paladin of Rodcet who encompasses healers and mystics.

What about paladins of Prexus- the manliest erudite sailing the oceans, or quellious who seek out universal peace. I'm sure you could even find a way for a paladin of brell to hang with some other shamans.

Don't think of paladins as being so narrow or shallow in terms of their roleplay.

Edit: I guess for necros you have to get really creative.
__________________
Level 60 Food Bandit Enchanter.
Burrito BanditO
ty Ambrotos ^
Last edited by Burrito; 02-02-2015 at 01:55 PM..
  #45  
Old 02-02-2015, 01:59 PM
maskedmelon maskedmelon is offline
Planar Protector

maskedmelon's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: not far from here
Posts: 5,793
Default

*nods*

My pally worships Prexus ^^ and the pantheon of Norrath offers paladins a wide range of personas ^^


That aside though, I said it makes for interesting RP, not common sense RP ^^ The more at odds the two companions are the more interesting the story of why they are together becomes. At the very least there is the Confucian ideal of one's enemey's enemy is one's friend ^^
  #46  
Old 02-02-2015, 02:10 PM
Bodybagger Bodybagger is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burrito [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As for the roleplay aspect- maybe if the Paladin only play lawful douchebag and Chad's everyone by being the embodiment of Mithanial Marr

What about paladins of Karana man, or maybe a paladin of Rodcet who encompasses healers and mystics.

What about paladins of Prexus- the manliest erudite sailing the oceans, or quellious who seek out universal peace. I'm sure you could even find a way for a paladin of brell to hang with some other shamans.

Don't think of paladins as being so narrow or shallow in terms of their roleplay.

Edit: I guess for necros you have to get really creative.
None of those effect a paladin role playing with a necro in any way. A Paladin regardless of diety would be within his duty to banish and destroy any necromancer or shadowknight, as would any worshipper of any diety you listed. That's why I said shaman is a stretch for most, and necro is outright not possible RP wise, as a true ally anyways...
  #47  
Old 02-02-2015, 02:43 PM
Erydan Ouragan Erydan Ouragan is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am inclined to agree. Although I find plenty of necros keen on the idea, I often find myself wondering what they get out of it ^^ paladins do not have SU here and are not the bane of all undead as many think. Sure we can spam our crappy nukes between attacks if Need to burn something more quickly and we've a slow enough weapon, but it still isn't fast and that mana is more efficiently spent on heals unless you have poor AC or something.

I am more than happy to take this duo opportunity when available though. It really is a lot of fun and very interesting from an RP perspective. ^^
True true true.

This is why paladins truly shine in groups. Sure you can duo or trio, whatever. But first and foremost, we're tanks. The damage and utility thing is just the cherry on top.

The main reason a paladin is invited to a group is because they need a tank.
  #48  
Old 02-02-2015, 04:48 PM
Chrysus Chrysus is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mentathiel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you want fun and strategy, try enchanter + wizard. Two classes renowned for being the first to die in a wipe, one mistake can kill you both, but it was amazingly fun when I tried it.
Played this duo a fair bit on live, it was a lot of fun. Not the best by min/maxer number parsing, but it was still effective. You can charm when wanting some intensity, or just blast things down when wanting casual/semi-afk gaming (do wizards play any other way?).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ranger/Rogue if they are pseudo twinked would be fun IMO. Throw fungi on ranger and Ragebringer on Rogue. Ranger pulls with Harmony, tanks with Snare/Flame Lick, and Rogue destroys.
I've played this duo some, it works but it's not as effective as I was expecting. If you don't get a slow proc (swarmcaller, earthcaller and/or locust lure) the ranger will need to kite while the rogue kills, which works, but it's less fun and slower then other duos.

We haven't had sufficient intimidation skill to fear kite when using this duo, I'd like to try it some more with that maxed.
  #49  
Old 02-03-2015, 01:02 AM
pharmakos pharmakos is offline
Planar Protector

pharmakos's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,910
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am inclined to agree. Although I find plenty of necros keen on the idea, I often find myself wondering what they get out of it ^^ paladins do not have SU here and are not the bane of all undead as many think. Sure we can spam our crappy nukes between attacks if Need to burn something more quickly and we've a slow enough weapon, but it still isn't fast and that mana is more efficiently spent on heals unless you have poor AC or something.

I am more than happy to take this duo opportunity when available though. It really is a lot of fun and very interesting from an RP perspective. ^^
paladin / necro combo can destroy a dungeon. single pulls all day, lots of crowd control, two sets of heals, huge DPS from the necro, necro gets a tank so that he doesn't have to heal his pet.

works out very well. vs. living or undead.
__________________
Escapegoat / Pharmakos / Madriax
  #50  
Old 02-03-2015, 01:49 AM
Nuktari Nuktari is offline
Sarnak

Nuktari's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Neriak Strip Club
Posts: 306
Default

Did Crypt in Seb (60 SK) with a 60 Dru pal of mine, most fun duo experience I ever had.
So many close calls, dat pixelated adrenaline.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.