Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Resolved Issues

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 06-28-2014, 01:39 AM
Bazia Bazia is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,152
Default

uh i grouped in seb all the time with encs and they did not have issues mezzing same level mobs and definitely not lower ones
  #42  
Old 06-28-2014, 03:20 AM
Ladytron Ladytron is offline
Sarnak

Ladytron's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 309
Default

screwball stuff going on and i cannot login to test myself as im suspended until further notice
__________________
FOR THE <EMPIRE>
Gravee ~~ Shaman

Knocked ~~ Monk


Gunnagetcha
~~ Wizard
  #43  
Old 06-28-2014, 08:04 AM
Tecmos Deception Tecmos Deception is offline
Planar Protector

Tecmos Deception's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
uh i grouped in seb all the time with encs and they did not have issues mezzing same level mobs and definitely not lower ones
There's a big difference between a level 45 enchanter CCing level 45 zol knights and level 54 enchanters mezzing level 53 illis knights. Furthermore, being able to fill a CC role in a group doesn't mean that there weren't still a lot of resists ... which is what we're talking about.
  #44  
Old 06-28-2014, 05:17 PM
koros koros is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tecmos Deception [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What context are you talking about?

You made it sound like a 54 enchanter would be able to reliably mez level 52-53 mobs pre-tash before the patch... and that is just plain untrue. 53s resisted 60 enchanters at a fair clip; a 54 would have had a BOATLOAD of resists in places like HS east or the nasty parts of the hole. That's why you NEVER see chanters that low in those places.

I'm not arguing that CC couldn't use some intentional resist tweaks... but you're just making shit up or not understanding how things were working or something with the stuff you're saying.
I have a 40 enchanter. His mezzes get(got) resisted at a far lower rate than normal all or nothing spells. Perhaps resists are off for 51+ mobs. They didn't magically get a new resist modifier because they were over 50.
  #45  
Old 06-28-2014, 06:10 PM
Tecmos Deception Tecmos Deception is offline
Planar Protector

Tecmos Deception's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by koros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have a 40 enchanter. His mezzes get(got) resisted at a far lower rate than normal all or nothing spells. Perhaps resists are off for 51+ mobs. They didn't magically get a new resist modifier because they were over 50.
Like I said before, p99 mezzes seem to either have a built-in resist mod or charisma influences their resists similar to how it helps lulls/charms work better. It feels like casting a mez on an untashed mob is similar to casting a root/slow/stun on a tashed mob I guess. That's significant for sure, but I don't know about "far lower rate" or "ridiculously low" or "lol 54 enchanters can CC ilis frogs np np" or whatever.

And who said that 51+ mobs don't have a special resist mod? 51+ mobs "magically" started summoning. Almost ALL of the 51+ mobs were introduced with Kunark expansion. It doesn't seem very far fetched imo.
  #46  
Old 06-28-2014, 11:06 PM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

off topic here, but seb on p99 is a lot harder than it was on live.


I solo'd the upper zone out for hours as a druid on live 58 to 60 and never once came across a summoning sebilite golem. On p99 it seems as if every sebilite golem summons, kind of irritating.

Anyway back on topic, something about green cons resisting dots and nukes from a 60 druid/sham seems wrong. Especially at the rate that its occurring, will post logs after work for reference.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #47  
Old 06-28-2014, 11:21 PM
Scrubosaur Scrubosaur is offline
Sarnak

Scrubosaur's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: WA
Posts: 257
Default

You are preaching to the choir. Exit was always camped because the golem's didn't summon and were decent exp. I don't remember anything summoning until Disco, Bar and Crypt. If you look at the 2001 notes for the golem's it even says that a druid can solo upper seb and that a group of 50s can do exit golems.
__________________
Scrubosaur - Necromancer

"Living my life 6 seconds at a time." - Unknown
  #48  
Old 06-28-2014, 11:24 PM
Potus Potus is offline
Planar Protector

Potus's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,782
Default

Please bug report the Sebilis stuff in a new thread, because yeah that zone shouldn't be super difficult.
  #49  
Old 06-29-2014, 07:36 PM
Haynar Haynar is offline
Developer

Haynar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 2,955
Default

Clearly it was not checked how often resists by greens were happening. And i see the value it was now. You all whine way too much over 1%. Thats it. 1% chance to resist. I adjusted it.

Blah.

H
__________________
Haynar <Millennial Snowflake Utopia>
  #50  
Old 06-29-2014, 09:46 PM
Scrubosaur Scrubosaur is offline
Sarnak

Scrubosaur's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: WA
Posts: 257
Default

Are you sure it wasn't higher than that? I spent a few hours killing green basilisks in RM and had quite a few resists on Deflux lifetaps. I mean yeah I know RNG is RNG but it felt like more than a 1% chance.
__________________
Scrubosaur - Necromancer

"Living my life 6 seconds at a time." - Unknown
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:39 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.