|
|
|
|
#2
12-13-2016, 12:49 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
a great man once said, "it's not what you know...it's what you can prove". the client can't detect AF programs because it registers macros as a key stroke, so it's impossible to truly give you a black and white answer. afaik, I remember reading somewhere that some GMs can analyze apm logs in order to identify probable cause of a player using an AF program. I don't think it's feasible to keep a running log of APM data of every single character on p99..that would require an immense amount of storage (maybe I'm wrong).. perhaps they need to 'turn it on' when someone is acting fishy? what I'm trying to get at is GM's have the capability to detect probable cause of a person using AF programs, though it's difficult, requires a lot of work, and in the end still not as black and white as detecting a showEQ or something of that sorts. my guess is that it's too much effort to ban a single person; the effort doesn't outweigh the reward (remember GMs are volunteers) not to mention the endless list of other issues, petitions, and clowns they have to deal with on a day-to-day basis. this issue sadly isn't low hanging fruit. i'm sure if detecting it was a quick win, they would be more inclined to do something about it on a micro-level. remember...they did do something about it on a raid level. my question is that even if someone is using an AF program, can the client even register the clicks/second if the purp has lets say 50ping. theoretically, doesn't the client only register one action per every 50 ms? so even if he's truly registering let's say 100 clicks per 50ms, wouldn't the client logs only show 1 click per 50ms? if my theory is right, then a legit guy should still be able to register 2 actions before the purp does.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
12-13-2016, 12:50 PM
|
|||
|
Guys. The staff here prioritize a classic server over a fun server. They have explicitly chosen rules that give all pixels to poopsocking neckbeards for the past 6 years. It's not the choice I would make. In fact it seems like a completely insane choice to me. But accept that it's not changing. Either figure out a system that lets you have fun anyway or stop whining.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
12-13-2016, 01:43 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
12-13-2016, 02:29 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's taken a long time for the nerds to figure out every possible way to exploit a situation and screw over other players on this very old elf sim. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
12-13-2016, 02:40 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Ballhaus - 35 Halfling Druid | Thees - 57 Iksar Monk | Siddartha - 51 DE Enchanter Fizziz - 35 Gnome Mage | Sixxes 27 Iksar Necro | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
12-13-2016, 12:56 PM
|
|||
|
Under normal circumstances, lore items prevent abusing quests like this. Allowing someone to spam turn in after turn in for loot rights is just bottlenecking an already horrible bottleneck. There's no reason this quest shouldn't be randomed.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
12-13-2016, 05:00 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
crabby old man playing 4000 year old goblin sim
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
12-13-2016, 07:28 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
12-13-2016, 12:56 PM
|
|||
|
Really guys.....
Your just in the wrong spot facing the wrong way. People who can bind have infinity more chance to get the turn in compared to people to can't. I swapped my main (melee) to turn in for my caster and I get the scout turn in quite a bit once I found a good spot. If your not getting it, try a better spot, learn from your mistakes and try again. | ||
|
|
|||
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
