Project 1999 is a eugenics plot to sterilize the mentally ill

[Lhancelot]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Humans and inanimate objects are indeed less queer than humans and other creatures.

Unless it's aliens. Humans + Aliens = hot.

[big_ole_jpn]

Originally Posted by Lhancelot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Unless it's aliens. Humans + Aliens = hot.

there is nuthin wrong with 2 consenting sentient beings doin thangs

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Lhancelot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Unless it's aliens. Humans + Aliens = hot.

Well sure, aliens, demons and mollusks are all perfectly normal companions when paired with humans, provided they have no fewer than three tentacles. I should have been less general and said "animals" instead of "creatures" though I did not want to suggest there might be something more ordinary or acceptable about say snakes sea cucumbers or anemones than worms or chickens. You know?

[aMindAmok]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I hardly think that tranny porn is sufficiently exotic to trump donkey porn though. While an apparent man with a vagina or woman with a penis may be significantly less ordinary than a barnyard burro, there is something far less bizarre about two humans engaged sexually than there is about a human and another creature. Humans and inanimate objects are indeed less queer than humans and other creatures.
:/

Im not so sure. Donkey sex is old news. Hell, there have been jokes about donkey shows in movies for decades now. It's the kind of thing young doods check out once or twice. Tranny porn on the otherhand cant be joked about openly because it would draw the ire of the sjw crowd. That gives it a special sense naughty that average beastiality doesnt have. Perhaps, when we were a less sensitive culture, the donkey would lose out on shock value.

[big_ole_jpn]

i personally think a person being permanently medically modified to be a better sex object is far more extreme than a one night stand with a burro

[aMindAmok]

the donkey wouldn't lose out *

Typing on a tablet with a crappy stylus

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by big_ole_jpn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i personally think a person being permanently medically modified to be a better sex object is far more extreme than a one night stand with a burro

Somewhere pedder talk guy grows more restless.

[Baler]

If you read OP's posts you become sterile.

[maskedmelon]

Ok fine, I stand corrected on all counts. I don't know what is more worrisome: the fact that donkey porn is a thing or the idea that young men regularly seek it out to "one up" one another >.>; Of course it has some history I suppose...was it Catherine the Great?

Curious though on the medical modification point J, aside from any underlying pschiatric issues, (and other than chopping up bits) how does it differ from other elective medical procedures and therapies such as nose jobs, liposuction, breast augmentation, HRT for pcos, HRT for hypogonadism, etc. All those things are done to make oneself "a better sex toy." Who don't want to either to be or to have a better sex toy?

While you may be free to have your burro, it is exceedingly difficult to become one and people are probably better off just finding someone who likes them as they are than chasing the dream of being as sought after and joked about as a burro. Is that the issue?

[big_ole_jpn]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok fine, I stand corrected on all counts. I don't know what is more worrisome: the fact that donkey porn is a thing or the idea that young men regularly seek it out to "one up" one another >.>; Of course it has some history I suppose...was it Catherine the Great?

Curious though on the medical modification point J, aside from any underlying pschiatric issues, (and other than chopping up bits) how does it differ from other elective medical procedures and therapies such as nose jobs, liposuction, breast augmentation, HRT for pcos, HRT for hypogonadism, etc. All those things are done to make oneself "a better sex toy." Who don't want to either to be or to have a better sex toy?

While you may be free to have your burro, it is exceedingly difficult to become one and people are probably better off just finding someone who likes them as they are than chasing the dream of being as sought after and joked about as a burro. Is that the issue?

These are somewhat related and sitting on a gradient -- well except HRT for medical issues is different as it's not necessarily cosmetic in nature even if it is elective (for instance if a person with hypogonadism suffers from depression, HRT to see if correcting chemical imbalance is a very obvious direction to approach treating it).

Minor vanity surgeries like boob jobs, nose jobs etc can be described as attempts to make oneself a more desirable sex object I guess, but it's a stretch. It's more likely an issue of personal vanity than a power exchange. I do think there's a certain indignity to them when your appearance already falls within normal bounds but I was fortunate enough to be born 10/10 so I won't throw stones about a temptation I never had to face. The big difference is that although likely a waste of resources, these minor procedures are a quick stop on the path to continuing living your life.

A nosejob doesn't require the ongoing consumption of psychoactive drugs to maintain. A nosejob'd nose is not detectable as such 100% of the time, and a person with a nosejob is not involving unwilling strangers in its sexual fantasies in its day to day life. Nosejobs don't come with a bizarre phony identity and social ruleset that can be used to club people into submitting to playing along with their fetish in public and even force employers to take penalties for refusing to LARP in the workplace so that babygurl can have better orgasms in the lady's restroom during her lunch break (just kidding about that - we all know what HRT does to sex drive).

Transexualism has more in common with wearing a fursuit in public than it does minor cosmetic surgery. The only reason you don't see a furry identity acceptance movement is that grafting animal fur to skin can't yet yield outcomes that even the delusional can call a cosmetic success. As soon as permanent fusing of the fursuit to the body is achievable, furry acceptance and tranny acceptance will be on equal footing.

You will see it in your lifetime if you make it another 60yrs, and the same reasons used to justify playing into imaginary gender categories (they are aren't they? isn't that what these same people constantly argue???) will be used to force people to play along with fursonas in public. Expect to see people with collars and bondage points permanently fused into their bodies, spots to link chains to, even switches you can flip to disable a person's voluntary control of their own body when we get to that level technologically, and you're a sick piece of shit bigot if you don't keep company with them. And out of business if your Chuck-E-Cheese even thinks about not allowing them around the kids. That is who they are and they will kill themself if the majority thinks such people should keep to the red-light district (or adult sims [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]) so you had better just stop being a bigot here and now buddy boy or your a murderer.

Meanwhile millions of horny teenagers sucked into the porn matrix make irreversible changes to their bodies that send them down the path of centering their lives around sex and vice and parents can't even stop them if they don't want to lose them to the state home. hungry globalists, among whom the you-know-whoish are disproportionately represented, get a hole lot more fresh meat to chew through and use your long haired, eyeshadowed sons like fleshlights. think of the children.

btw I don't oppose any adult's right to do these things to themselves, and indeed linetrap is probably a multi-multi-millionaire so was it a bad outcome for her? prolly not, even tho she does not remotely pass and came out looking like a very attractive synthetic sex machine and not a female. Btw i respect her pronouns here cuz i don't mind being a part of her sexual fantasy[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] (actually she's gross and a bad lay, have you ever watched one of her scenes? lol). They have their rights and I had my freedom of association.

All I'm sayin is that giving trannies purchase in polite society and telling them they are just like real females just cuz you want to fuck a couple examples (who would be more attractive as effeminate boys btw, but you're most likely some form of str8cuck) or you're a marxist-feminist looking to add more people to your category of the class struggle is perhaps not the best thing for the collective mental health of our nation.

i heard brevity is the soul of wit so im gonna stop there while this is still bite sized, bye!