Lets play beastlords and Berserkers in classic! - Page 4

Savard18 · #1 09-20-2010, 03:42 PM

The MGB Spiritual _____ line of spells (Increase HP / Mana per tick) were nice to have during raids, but again, they were not needed.

That was my point, the Beastlord is a class that is never needed, it is only nice to have every so often at best. It was a bad idea to introduce it as a class and the class now still is frowned upon on Live when it comes to raiding.

It is a filler class for groups also, think about it, you never wanted a BL unless you knew them.

kingsBlend · #2 09-20-2010, 03:53 PM

I'm pretty sure the Beastlord didn't even want to group with the Beastlord and vice-versa.

Serith · #3 09-20-2010, 04:06 PM

Let's not.

nalkin · #4 09-20-2010, 07:22 PM

Actually, as demonstrated in the past, the "its classic" argument is not valid since there have been classic elements chosen not to be implemented. So its a "sort of trying to be close to classic as possible" server with dev choices playing a factor. So if yuns think about it, beastlord isn't really that bad of a question... Of course beastlords are stupid so it really is but ya know what im saying.

Kassel · #5 09-20-2010, 07:30 PM

Quote:

as close to a classic server as technically possible

....for people who do this on their free time as a favor to you......

Better?

I feel " its not classic" is very valid.

liveitup1216 · #6 09-20-2010, 08:00 PM

my only point that if it turns out the devs say "beastlord could be easily implemented without much hassle", there's no real reason to lulzwtfcomplain.

it probably isnt, probably wont happen, but to demand it doesnt happen is equally douchy.

Savard18 · #7 09-20-2010, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by liveitup1216 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

my only point that if it turns out the devs say "beastlord could be easily implemented without much hassle", there's no real reason to lulzwtfcomplain.

it probably isnt, probably wont happen, but to demand it doesnt happen is equally douchy.

I disagree, it is a lot more reasonable to ask for it to not happen on a server that is "as close to a classic server as technically possible" than it would be to ask for it to happen. If Luclin was planned to be added I wouldn't bother to post, but I doubt it will happen.

Bubbles · #8 09-20-2010, 08:32 PM

If you're looking for something "far more reasonable":

Halfling Rangers/Paladins, Gnome Shadowknights, etc.

Since their sole purpose would be amusing people until kunark was released, it would give a couple extra bored people a new class/race combo or two to play around with.

But once again, it's not classic, and certainly not worth the dev's time at this point.

The only purpose adding beastlords would have is to take some of the "lolyourclasssux0r" heat off of rangers.

RKromwell · #9 09-21-2010, 12:04 AM

I wouldn't mind seeing Beastlords. You can add them without the space kittens. While I don't see a need for them. Some of you need to remember that not everyone plays the game to be a raider. Do I want them...no not really but if at one point they were added I wouldn't bitch about it.

Puyen · #10 09-21-2010, 07:07 AM

Why bother mentioning this when these classes and races were not introduced in classic and kunark. People when kunark ends then ask because we are not very close to releasing luclin.