![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
+1 for the above post
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
I think if its not region based its loses the owned territory feel. The lack of classes is ok its countered by the good territory owned by evils. iksars being mixed faction is also kind if lame they'll basically be ffa at ten. I think they should just be evil
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
If you go by EQ lore, the Iksars really aren't Evil in the sense that they would ally themselves with other Evil races. They're Evil in the sense that they view themselves as the master race of Norrath and view every other race as beneath them and worthy of death. So really, it wouldn't make sense for Iksars to officially ally with Neriak any more than it would make sense for them to ally with the good races.
From a lore perspective it makes much more sense for the Iksar to just kill whoever they want. This would also apply to Iksar killing other Iksar, as the Iksar culture is all about purging its weak members. In a happy coincidence, allowing Iksars to choose their team also turns out to be good from a balance perspective, as it denies any one team a monopoly on Kunark, which is an enormously powerful advantage (as SZ showed) and quickly leads to imbalanced teams. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
lmfao | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for the responses everyone! Halfling shaman it is! | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Two teams: Evils and goods. Allow humans and barbs and eruds to pick sides based on diety.
Dolic | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
But, I personally like the concept of 3-4 teams better. | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|