Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #321  
Old 06-11-2015, 09:32 PM
Lojik Lojik is offline
Planar Protector

Lojik's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,954
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That is correct senator. So who is sending you my private pm's? Only people I sent that message to was Uncharted and Iruinedyourday.

Definitely couldn't be Uncharted.

You doing me dirty Iruinedyourday?
Is she into nerd bashing?
  #322  
Old 06-12-2015, 02:26 AM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Private guild forums are completely separate from this forum. You and Quickfingers are the only people dirty enough to post private shit publicly.

Tool.
This seems to be the argument a child pornographer would make.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #323  
Old 06-12-2015, 02:27 AM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
per·ti·nent ˈpərtnənt/ adjective adjective: pertinent relevant or applicable to a particular matter; apposite. "she asked me a lot of very pertinent questions"

No, none of these scenarios seem pertinent.

hare·brained ˈherbrānd/ adjective adjective: hare-brained; adjective: harebrained rash; ill-judged. "a harebrained scheme" synonyms: ill-judged, rash, foolish, foolhardy, reckless, madcap, wild, silly, stupid, ridiculous, absurd, idiotic, asinine, imprudent, impracticable, unworkable, unrealistic, unconsidered, half-baked, ill-thought-out, ill-advised, ill-conceived; More

That seems more appropriate.
Glad to see you have given up trying to support your statement. Good little troll.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #324  
Old 06-12-2015, 04:04 AM
azxten azxten is offline
Fire Giant

azxten's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 757
Default

I'll join Forsaken to pad former TMO membership numbers. Are there varying rates on my alts former guilds?
  #325  
Old 06-12-2015, 04:44 AM
Mead Mead is offline
Planar Protector

Mead's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,477
Default

TMO still doesn't have their own forums?
  #326  
Old 06-12-2015, 05:40 AM
Llodd Llodd is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ok. Forsaken is not TMO re-forming under a new guildtag. TMO fractured. There's quite a few of us, myself included, who don't support the new guild or have much (any faith) in its leadership. Forsaken is a new guild. Same people. Not the same number of people or resources TMO had. The suspension is unfortunate seeing as the new guild needs as much momentum as possible, but it's also hilarious and speaks volumes of the coup's leadership.
The point is (which fatlarti deliberately omits in every post he makes ) is that Foreskin is mostly made up of ex TMO (and for absence of doubt this means people who were up until recently tagged under that name). Yes TMO still exists, yes Foreskin didnt get the guild bank and some other shit that's irrelevant.

The only way fatlarti is ever going to answer the underlying question of this whole stupid thread and which Yendor put so simply (too simple for fatlartis) is if he asks the question himself.

You guys need to get him to frame the question for himself . He is incapable of answering simple questions - so let him frame it with all the gobbledey**** he likes to, pointlesssly, pad out his evasive replies with.

People seem under the misconception that because tmo fractured that this somehow means that a sizeable proportion can reform and merely continue as though they are an entirely new entity.

Worth remembering that the rules aren't simply about stopping guilds abusing the system.
  #327  
Old 06-12-2015, 06:22 AM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,525
Default

I think it is is a good way to try force a reinvention of the raid rules by finding holes that allow large groups of players to ignore the lock outs of the class system.

The ruling that was made stops people from being able to reclassify en masse without a cool down. The side effect of that would be whether the ruling only applies to large groups of players, or whether individual players carry a Class C cool-down too.

If players didn't have their own personal cool down I guess it could lead to a system where players could hop between a class C and class R guild as they pleased, and could encourage class c guilds to create 'unaffiliated' subsidiary guilds used for guild hopping into class R raiding.

Just the thoughts of an irrelevant outsider.
  #328  
Old 06-12-2015, 08:21 AM
Bazia Bazia is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,152
Default

how do u get harassed on the internet
  #329  
Old 06-12-2015, 09:30 AM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,545
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Glad to see you have given up trying to support your statement. Good little troll.
^^^ This idiot is tired of getting rekt by Yendor so he deflects to claim pseudo-victory in an issue he created and set the victory conditions himself. Coincidentally, nobody else gives a fuck that he never bothered to read the rest of the thread because he's the one that looks like a fool for thinking they should read it for him.

You, sir, are a master debater.
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
  #330  
Old 06-12-2015, 09:48 AM
Mistle Mistle is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 164
Default

Guilds can put themselves in class C without any GM involvement. They have to petition to get into class R. The logical thing to do is put ALL guilds not on the raid roster into class C by default so they have to petition to get into R. It would just be a formality with up and comer guilds like Anonymous and would give time to examine class dodging attempts like rebranded TMO/Forsaken.

Problem solved.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:07 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.