Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are making the claim my data and math is invalid.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Gloomlord]

For the last time: we told you make a parse as shaman as group DPS.

I mean, you record yourself, right? Prove us all wrong!

Because, like it or not: a solo DPS parse as shaman is irrelevant in a 2 charm group.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For the last time: we told you make a parse as shaman as group DPS.

I mean, you record yourself, right? Prove us all wrong!

Because, like it or not: a solo DPS parse as shaman is irrelevant in a 2 charm group.

This is where you are simply wrong.

Mob AC/HP/Resists do not change when you play solo vs. group. You have no basis in your claim my DPS parses are irrelevant, or would change.

I am sorry you are angry that I am not complying with your request. That is not a valid argument for claiming my data is irrelevant.

You need to prove my data is invalid first.

[Ripqozko]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is where you are simply wrong.

Mob AC/HP/Resists do not change when you play solo vs. group. You have no basis in your claim my DPS parses are irrelevant, or would change.

I am sorry you are angry that I am not complying with your request. That is not a valid argument for claiming my data is irrelevant.

Mega Yikes

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Now you understand what you have been doing to me for 250 pages. Progress!

You are asking me to prove a negative by asking me to prove my data is valid.

No. You are simply being asked to provide relevent data. The irrelevant data that you have provided - which you seem to believe "others are asking you to prove is valid" - is simply irrelevant to this discussion, and its "validity" is simply irrelevant to this discussion. Only the validity of relevant data/evidence would be relevant. This really isn't hard hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are making the claim my data and math is invalid. It is up to you to prove this claim.

The irrelevance of your data invalidates it from being relevant data - does that verbiage help you understand?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You really can't take what you dish out for 250 pages.

I am not sure why your post indicates that you believe that you know and can make objective claims about what others "can't take", and you have provided zero evidence to support that belief, and I am not sure what point you think you are making or fact you think you are refuting in the above Quote.

[Gloomlord]

Then you're a troll?

Glad we covered this up.

You are a dishonest arsehole, and should be treated as such.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Then you're a troll?

Glad we covered this up.

You are a dishonest arsehole, and should be treated as such.

No. The only trolls here are the people like yourself who just keep claiming all evidence that disagrees with you is invalid.

It's such an obvious troll tactic.

You are simply trying to troll me into agreement. It is just sad.

[Ripqozko]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No. The only trolls here are the people like yourself who just keep claiming all evidence that disagrees with you is invalid.

It's such an obvious troll tactic.

You are simply trying to troll me into agreement. It is just sad.

Mega Yikes

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Mega Yikes

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Gloomlord]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No. The only trolls here are the people like yourself who just keep claiming all evidence that disagrees with you is invalid.

It's such an obvious troll tactic.

You are simply trying to troll me into agreement. It is just sad.

We already went above and beyond the call of duty when we gave you those parses. It showed mage DPS being higher than shaman DPS, and it was recorded in a group. Troxx wasn't trolling you, and you spat in his face.

Any intelligent troll would have bowed out of this thread at that point, but you continue in the name of your ego.