Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-22-2010, 11:45 AM
Excision Rottun Excision Rottun is offline
Fire Giant

Excision Rottun's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alberta
Posts: 521
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jete [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
we've been told we won't be able to swarm kite
You can swarm kite.


You can not AoE kite, however.
  #22  
Old 03-22-2010, 11:55 AM
Jete Jete is offline
Sarnak

Jete's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Excision Rottun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You can swarm kite.


You can not AoE kite, however.
Its good thing we have you around! Problem fixed! Yaaaay!
__________________
♪♫♪ Jete Veux ♪♫♪
  #23  
Old 03-22-2010, 12:34 PM
Icecometus Icecometus is offline
Sarnak

Icecometus's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Secrets [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
EQC is coming out coincident with the rapture.

True story.

Also, it won't work on modern hardware too well. You need EQ Windows to even get the EQC client to run on Windows 7/Vista.

I'd say stay here forever.
http://www.eqclassic.org/forums/view...php?f=9&t=1913 I hope you are wrong Secrets cause I hate WinEQ.

Well it might take another year or two to finish the project so plenty of time to enjoy P99.
  #24  
Old 03-22-2010, 01:01 PM
Secrets Secrets is offline
VIP / Contributor

Secrets's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icecometus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
http://www.eqclassic.org/forums/view...php?f=9&t=1913 I hope you are wrong Secrets cause I hate WinEQ.

Well it might take another year or two to finish the project so plenty of time to enjoy P99.
It's true, and also, it could have been done 2 years ago if they had any motivation to finish it. Only person who is working on it hardcore atm is Harakiri, hence why I left.

And I don't even think Harakiri is working on it anymore.

And yes, you can consider this as a resignation from EQClassic for anyone wondering.

To quote Yeahlight, "shit sucks".

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:...ient=firefox-a
Last edited by Secrets; 03-22-2010 at 01:07 PM..
  #25  
Old 03-22-2010, 01:20 PM
Loke Loke is offline
Fire Giant

Loke's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: AKANON PROBABLY
Posts: 781
Default

Jete, bards aren't the only ones. Correct me if I'm wrong, but currently monks in P99 are subject to the Luclin era mitigation and avoidance nerfs. Everyone knows that monks have a weight limit that we must maintain to avoid suffering an AC penalty. What most people don't know is the reasoning behind that weight limit was because monks were given a higher avoidance and mitigation that was on par with chain or plate (I can't remember) classes. In Luclin, a number of notable players started to complain about monks being over-powered (In all honesty, we were), a thus our mitigation was nerfed (yet our weight restrictions remained /boggle).

Personally, I don't think monks are all that bad on this server, and I feel I compliment any group I join fairly well. I'm not complaining. I'm just providing an example of how bards are not the only class that is weaker or more restricted than it was in classic.

Honestly, I'd take the way aggro works on this server over increased avoidance / mitigation any day. It's definitely not classic, but you won't hear any complaints out of me. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Edit : Also, Snifs post was the best post in this thread.
  #26  
Old 03-22-2010, 02:02 PM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatMagic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This thread should end at his response..
i·ro·ny

1   /ˈaɪ[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]ni, ˈaɪ[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]ər-/ [ahy-ruh-nee, ahy-er-]–noun,plural-nies.
1.the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning: the irony of her reply, “How nice!” when I said I had to work all weekend.
__________________
  #27  
Old 03-22-2010, 02:08 PM
Simon Belmont Simon Belmont is offline
Aviak

Simon Belmont's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i·ro·ny

1   /ˈaɪ[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]ni, ˈaɪ[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]ər-/ [ahy-ruh-nee, ahy-er-]–noun,plural-nies.
1.the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning: the irony of her reply, “How nice!” when I said I had to work all weekend.
hmm... so whats it called when you post a rebuttal in the wrong thread? =p
  #28  
Old 03-22-2010, 02:30 PM
Ferok Ferok is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 521
Send a message via AIM to Ferok
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Belmont [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
hmm... so whats it called when you post a rebuttal in the wrong thread? =p
Confusing :-\
  #29  
Old 03-22-2010, 02:33 PM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Belmont [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
hmm... so whats it called when you post a rebuttal in the wrong thread? =p
Am I missing something? :P
Are you talking to me? :P
__________________
  #30  
Old 03-22-2010, 03:26 PM
Aeolwind Aeolwind is offline
Developer

Aeolwind's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Watauga, TN
Posts: 1,641
Send a message via AIM to Aeolwind Send a message via MSN to Aeolwind Send a message via Yahoo to Aeolwind
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Jete, bards aren't the only ones. Correct me if I'm wrong, but currently monks in P99 are subject to the Luclin era mitigation and avoidance nerfs. Everyone knows that monks have a weight limit that we must maintain to avoid suffering an AC penalty. What most people don't know is the reasoning behind that weight limit was because monks were given a higher avoidance and mitigation that was on par with chain or plate (I can't remember) classes. In Luclin, a number of notable players started to complain about monks being over-powered (In all honesty, we were), a thus our mitigation was nerfed (yet our weight restrictions remained /boggle).
I seem to remember this in the patch notes about being fixed.
__________________
I have walked my way since the beginning of time. Sometimes I give, sometimes I take & it is mine to know which and when.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nilbog
If all the polls I have done up until now fully counted, you would be playing on some abomination of a PVP server with 2-10 boxing based on votes from people named xcm234nv and adfa234.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.