Project 1999: Teal

[westarcher]

Originally Posted by Ethereum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

will they be joined eventually?

That's my question as well, once the hype dies down to reasonable levels.

[MasterCS]

Originally Posted by westarcher [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's my question as well, once the hype dies down to reasonable levels.

Did you not read the post? It literally says it will be merged back once the population evens out between the two. "Whether that be weeks, months or years"

[Legday]

Do all of the same patch release and expansion dates stand, or is the green server's timeline restarting on day 1 of Teal so that they both follow the same schedule?

[Glasken]

Originally Posted by Legday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do all of the same patch release and expansion dates stand, or is the green server's timeline restarting on day 1 of Teal so that they both follow the same schedule?

It reads as if this will be a clone of current green, linked hand in hand, and rejoined just prior to Kunark.

If I had to guess.

[ELance]

Although never the greatest enthusiast of Project '99 after I learned about the great GM intervention and camping policies, I was still on the fence about green, even though all four of my characters had been rendered unplayable with its launch, but this knocked me right off of it.

It would be poor form for me to express shock and amazement, since I already did once before. I had no reason to expect anything more than this, and I would only be projecting my own hopes, expectations and vision of Project 1999 onto strangers on the Internet.

It is probably unnecessary to say that, although I was momentarily surprised by the overcrowding as it were, and spent a few hours in examination of the circumstances, it did not cause me any great distress, being that there were obvious solutions to the difficulty, which was not a difficulty at all, for it was a rule of the game, and all players fell under it, namely reevaluation of my expectations, greater exploration and understanding of the world and a slightly more efficient restructuring of my methods. I see now that such things will be unnecessary.

Everquest was once called the McDonald's of MMORPGs on Usenet. I admit it would not be my first choice of MMORPG, but all the older ones are gone or changed. If we are so passionate about it, why not try to surpass this appelation? Left untouched by staff and owners it could be an interesting game. But the wisest people on Usenet did not think much of it then, and it does not seem to me that it would be much better if more changes were made in that direction. One might argue that if the drive through lane were crowded, the customer might park his car and go inside instead. But alas I am only repeating twenty year old debates.

[Tecmos Deception]

Originally Posted by ELance [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Although never the greatest enthusiast of Project '99 after I learned about the great GM intervention and camping policies, I was still on the fence about green, even though all four of my characters had been rendered unplayable with its launch, but this knocked me right off of it.

It would be poor form for me to express shock and amazement, since I already did once before. I had no reason to expect anything more than this, and I would only be projecting my own hopes, expectations and vision of Project 1999 onto strangers on the Internet.

It is probably unnecessary to say that, although I was momentarily surprised by the overcrowding as it were, and spent a few hours in examination of the circumstances, it did not cause me any great distress, being that there were obvious solutions to the difficulty, which was not a difficulty at all, for it was a rule of the game, and all players fell under it, namely reevaluation of my expectations, greater exploration and understanding of the world and a slightly more efficient restructuring of my methods. I see now that such things will be unnecessary.

Everquest was once called the McDonald's of MMORPGs on Usenet. I admit it would not be my first choice of MMORPG, but all the older ones are gone or changed. If we are so passionate about it, why not try to surpass this appelation? Left untouched by staff and owners it could be an interesting game. But the wisest people on Usenet did not think much of it then, and it does not seem to me that it would be much better if more changes were made in that direction. One might argue that if the drive through lane were crowded, the customer might park his car and go inside instead. But alas I am only repeating twenty year old debates.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[pink grapefruit]

Originally Posted by ELance [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Although never the greatest enthusiast of Project '99 after I learned about the great GM intervention and camping policies, I was still on the fence about green, even though all four of my characters had been rendered unplayable with its launch, but this knocked me right off of it.

It would be poor form for me to express shock and amazement, since I already did once before. I had no reason to expect anything more than this, and I would only be projecting my own hopes, expectations and vision of Project 1999 onto strangers on the Internet.

It is probably unnecessary to say that, although I was momentarily surprised by the overcrowding as it were, and spent a few hours in examination of the circumstances, it did not cause me any great distress, being that there were obvious solutions to the difficulty, which was not a difficulty at all, for it was a rule of the game, and all players fell under it, namely reevaluation of my expectations, greater exploration and understanding of the world and a slightly more efficient restructuring of my methods. I see now that such things will be unnecessary.

Everquest was once called the McDonald's of MMORPGs on Usenet. I admit it would not be my first choice of MMORPG, but all the older ones are gone or changed. If we are so passionate about it, why not try to surpass this appelation? Left untouched by staff and owners it could be an interesting game. But the wisest people on Usenet did not think much of it then, and it does not seem to me that it would be much better if more changes were made in that direction. One might argue that if the drive through lane were crowded, the customer might park his car and go inside instead. But alas I am only repeating twenty year old debates.

tf this post even about lol

[Frug]

Originally Posted by ELance [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Although never the greatest enthusiast of Project '99 after I learned about the great GM intervention and camping policies, I was still on the fence about green, even though all four of my characters had been rendered unplayable with its launch, but this knocked me right off of it..

drama much?

[Intensifier]

I know you guys have a plan already, but i am just saying maybe not do transfers. The reason i say this is because some guilds and people dead set on moving their guild friends and already had a plan at the start. I for one will move to teal regardless, but if you consider what i am saying this would allow the people who didn't make a plan to start planning together and create from start their guild builds.

It makes it so the people who do go have to start to work together and a fresh chance, and i do believe you will still have a very very large number move over.

[joppykid]

Originally Posted by westarcher [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's my question as well, once the hype dies down to reasonable levels.

Literally from the post says "We will be keeping an eye on player numbers and merge Teal back into Green as soon as the combined population is appropriate for the current content, whether that be in weeks, months, or years.
"