![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Reasons why we should have this thread locked | |||
| Severe derailment / no longer useful |
|
1 | 5.56% |
| Paul may have a mental breakdown |
|
7 | 38.89% |
| Nobody cares |
|
6 | 33.33% |
| lel |
|
4 | 22.22% |
| Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
But there's no way I would have been able to tolerate the amount of cleric+enchanter duoing I have in the last few years if each mov were giving me only 1/4 the XP it'd give me if I killed it solo with a nuke. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
Hats off for being willing to do a test to prove things. Unfortunately you probably won't change minds of anyone.
IIRC I proved that charmed pets wear two rings instead of just one once, giving 55 HP rings to a lvl 1 mob to show its max HP increased by 110 not 55. Screenshots, math, etc. Some other 60 chanter refused to believe what I was demonstrating. Catherine I think? | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
I've played two charmers and a cleric to 60. I know what i am talking about.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
No, I've provided correct information. Sorry you're such a piece of shit that you're unwilling to at least read it, though.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||
|
paulgiamatti.... All of your posts have been reread and confirmed that you have no idea what you are talking about and posted rubbish.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Hey paul, nice to see you again.
Yeah I'm out of this thread too, can't help the helpless if they can't understand conventional logic or reason. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Ah shit the OP was Soeki NOW it's making sense.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|