![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
You’re not making a strong case yet … We need facts! Math! Logic! Above all … we need concrete thinking! Why waste a spot on 55 dps of shaman when a druid brings o so much more non-redundant utility and emergency life saving prowess … and can nuke better than you?! 100% up time potg in a full caster group is sounding pretty good right about now. That’s a lot of extra mana for everybody involved rather than the self-cannibalizing shaman who is still only 55dps.
__________________
| |||
Last edited by Troxx; 09-14-2022 at 06:23 PM..
|
#2
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Shaman offers more doable camps than Mage or Druid, and their DPS isn't lowering your kills per hour. So the Shaman gives the better number of doable camps and maintains your kills per hour. They also offer a lot of safety, which means your kills per hour remain consistent. Every wipe your group has will lower their average kills per hour. Leveling with a 4 man caster group is going to be fast, whether you have a Shaman, a Mage, or a Druid. It's already going to be a great leveling experience. If you care more about the leveling experience, other classes would be better than a Shaman from 1-60. I said this on page 1. But since OP didn't specify the level range, I am taking into consideration the entire game, including level 60 farming. I don't know why this bothers you so much you have to troll for hundreds of posts.
__________________
| |||
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 09-14-2022 at 06:27 PM..
|
#3
|
|||
|
![]() I am applying DSM logic.
A). The mage does more than double the damage of the shaman. We don’t need that extra dps so let’s take redundant utility. B) a focused dps druid will put out 80-90% of a shamans dps in nukes and adds DS along with a ton of utility. Some is redundant but lots of it is not. Therefore druid is actually better than a shaman in this group! Again. I we’re playing along and have hopped aboard the DSM thought-train. (Choo choo!)
__________________
| ||
#4
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
B) This is where you run into trouble. A Shaman offers more than a Druid. It is why Shamans can solo way more camps than a Druid can. So no, this isn't correct. Don't you find it odd that the best class in the game (Enchanter) is also the best soloer? Shamans also happen to be a top tier soloer. Coincidence?
__________________
| |||
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 09-14-2022 at 06:36 PM..
|
#5
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | |||
#6
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
If you take the top two solo classes and put them in a duo, you open up all of the camp options that both an Enchanter and a Shaman can do by themselves, which is a large portion of the game. Being in a group also opens up camps that you cannot do solo. This is why the Shaman/Enchanter/Monk trio is so strong. All three are top solo classes. Monk is the weakest of the three, but it is still the strongest melee-only soloing class. Put them together, and you are easily doing all the camps that any of them could do solo, and more. You honestly don't need as much DPS and CHing as you think lol. This game really isn't that hard, and most mobs are tuned for players with gear below what P99ers typically have due to the server being in stasis. That is why the DPS breakpoints aren't that hard to hit. Everybody knows everything, and are typically over geared.
__________________
| |||
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 09-14-2022 at 06:48 PM..
|
#7
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | |||
Last edited by PlsNoBan; 09-14-2022 at 06:54 PM..
|
#8
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Please nobody continue down this path with him(except cyx, because I love reading your posts) | |||
#9
|
|||
|
![]() I made the druid argument earlier in this thread somewhere. Don't care to dig for it. Druid is a WAY better option than shaman if animals are available to charm. It's not even a contest in a zone like Chardok. Likely better even without charm. In the EXTREMELY unlikely event that "safety" is needed beyond 2 encs and a cleric. Druid direct healing is as good/better? Torpor isn't an emergency heal for when shit hits the fan. Druid also has the option of evac. Their utility has less overlap with the existing group and their buffs are better for casters than shaman buffs. I said this before somewhere but the only caster/priest class that is potentially WORSE for this group is Wizard. I honestly think literally every other caster/priest would be preferable to shaman for this specific group makeup.
I like how we went back to Ixiblat and WW dragons being the only thing a shaman is better for. Just stick to that argument DSM. It's the best one you've got. The best 4 caster/priest group solely for ixiblat and ww dragons probably includes shaman. The rest of it is just plain bullshit. Nobody is basing their group comp for the entire 1-60 process just so they can do ixi and ww slightly better and ignoring 99% of the rest of the lvl 60 content.
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||
Last edited by PlsNoBan; 09-14-2022 at 06:36 PM..
|
#10
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
![]() |
|
|