ban on assault weapons and 10 round clip limit

[Humerox]

Originally Posted by Masq [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

do you Americans honestly think banning assault weapons is a bad thing? I can't tell if this is a troll or not.

I don't think it's a bad thing.

[Lexical]

Originally Posted by Humerox [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My suitcase nuke and Stinger will be in my garage, thank you very much.

Make sure you neighbors don't find out and that you have the permits for such things or you will still be disturbing the peace :P

[Lexical]

Originally Posted by Masq [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

do you Americans honestly think banning assault weapons is a bad thing? I can't tell if this is a troll or not.

I think it is more of a step in the wrong direction if anything. I don't think it would be the end of the world if they are banned, but I just think there are much better solutions to the problem.

[Humerox]

Originally Posted by Lexical [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it is against the constitution to incite violence and disturb the peace.

Pray tell. I missed that part Lex...please show me where that is again?

Actually I think some of the laws that limit our 1st Amendment rights are a little out-of-line...but that's just me.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Humerox]

Originally Posted by Lexical [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Make sure you neighbors don't find out and that you have the permits for such things or you will still be disturbing the peace :P

Permitz? Ve haff to have Ze permitz?

[Lexical]

Originally Posted by Humerox [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pray tell. I missed that part Lex...please show me where that is again?

Actually I think some of the laws that limit our 1st Amendment rights are a little out-of-line...but that's just me.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Read up on the due process clause of the 14th amendment.

[Lexical]

Originally Posted by Humerox [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Permitz? Ve haff to have Ze permitz?

jawohl.

[Lexical]

You are still a terrorist Humerox.

[Humerox]

Originally Posted by Lexical [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Read up on the due process clause of the 14th amendment.

I'm particularly aware of the without due process of law part...seems like a lot of people believe that doesn't apply, though.

To be clear...I mean people read it as:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

And not as it was intended to be read. You know...with the:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Part and all.

[Lexical]

Originally the Due process clause in the 14th amendment only applied to the government around the early 1900s, it was extended to private contracts and has progressively moved to protecting individual from any entities.

From it: "[w]ithout doubt...denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men."