![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
this is stupid there is enuff people for multiple 30+ man guilds to exist, boxing is not needed
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#12
|
|||
|
Legalize yellow text. Can't chew bru.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#13
|
|||
|
boxing back in 99 was uncommon though since you had to have some technical flair to get your boxes running on one comp to beat the forced fullscreen.
Some of the more serious neckbeards ran it on seperate computers though. Still, it wasnt until a few years into EQ that everyone and their dog ran several boxes. Which, if they allow it here, is what will happen. No, keep the banhammer on those who 2-box imho.
__________________
Ruban Poodlehumper
Cleric of Ak'anon also Chmel - druid, Lupulus - rogue, Hraesvaelg - warrior & Vidar - paladin. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#14
|
|||
|
Really bad idea.
__________________
Rephaite - Green99
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#15
|
|||
|
Allow it for characters under level 45 imo...
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#16
|
|||
|
It's a good idea it allows for several small crews which is healthy for box life. Smaller crews are able to do seb chardok howling stone etc.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#17
|
|||
|
Yeah! You guys should allow 2boxing, and then allow ISboxer so you can script a whole group to do everything you need while you control one character! Maybe you guys should stop griefing each other so population can rise.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#18
|
|||
|
Less people'd quit with 2boxing. Especially if you then give amnesty to all the people caught doing it (0 in Holo to my knowledge).
But I'm against it. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#19
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#20
|
|||
|
To my knowledge, 1 now. Thanks HB-stein.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|