Taylor Swift is going to the SuperBowl

[Ciderpress]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wdym?

Elon, generally, doesn't like the rapid development of narrowly-targeted low level AI, specifically because of this sort of issue. AI can, in theory, make anyone do anything. That's obviously dangerous and warrants serious consideration.

Despite his desire to get a microchip inside your brain.

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by Ciderpress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Elon, generally, doesn't like the rapid development of narrowly-targeted low level AI, specifically because of this sort of issue. AI can, in theory, make anyone do anything. That's obviously dangerous and warrants serious consideration.

Despite his desire to get a microchip inside your brain.

To defeat a technique you must first master it.

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by Ciderpress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Elon had the gall to not ban people unless they break the actual law. He literally bought the entire platform essentially just to make that one change. It should never have come to that, but a bunch of unelected babies decided to play god with how information is disseminated in a free society and he was like um nope to all that. He's also been highly vocal about the unforeseen consequences of cheap AI models, so this is totally consistent. It is, or should be, illegal already to digitally remove somebody's clothes without their consent.

That's basic "human decency". We cannot rely on the state to enforce that anymore. Look where that has gotten us.

[BigChief]

Originally Posted by Ciderpress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Elon had the gall to not ban people unless they break the actual law. He literally bought the entire platform essentially just to make that one change. It should never have come to that, but a bunch of unelected babies decided to play god with how information is disseminated in a free society and he was like um nope to all that. He's also been highly vocal about the unforeseen consequences of cheap AI models, so this is totally consistent. It is, or should be, illegal already to digitally remove somebody's clothes without their consent.

POS Baby-man ELon bought it to STOP free speech against him and to use it for his own racist, misogynist, and anti-Semitic views.

Just like baby man Trump tried to ban TikTok after a teenage girl kept mocking him on it.

[Duik]

Is the Swift person saying vote and vote for a particular team? If so, booo.
If she just saying listen people get out and vote. Sounds like good advice. Even of its coming from a pouty whining adult baby.
Either way, country metal is now a thing so i can continue to be friends with the wife. It's like steampunk but for farmers.

[Ciderpress]

There was also a time, long before tweeter, when humans talked and often said untrue things. And then other humans would correct them, and the undecided 3rd parties could observe those interactions and make their own minds up.

Luckily we wised up though and realized that everything is potentially dangerous except for the stuff I like.

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Ciderpress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There was also a time, long before tweeter, when humans talked and often said untrue things. And then other humans would correct them, and the undecided 3rd parties could observe those interactions and make their own minds up.

Luckily we wised up though and realized that everything is potentially dangerous except for the stuff I like.

Those unreal things were filtered through institutions such as the journalism profession, as well as early telecommunications, which had robust rules for content.

The status quo is a currently unfolding disaster.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Those unreal things were filtered through institutions such as the journalism profession, as well as early telecommunications, which had robust rules for content.

That's granola.

The Fairness Doctrine only applied to broadcast licenses.

The report by the Congressional Research Service notes that broadcast is "distinct from cable, satellite, and the Internet, which are all services for which consumers must pay.

"It does not appear that the Fairness Doctrine may be applied constitutionally to cable or satellite service providers," it continues.

[Duik]

When i hear people say someone said to elon go make ya own twitter. So he did. Are just fundamentally wrong.
He made nothing. He bought it then made changes that he felt made him look strong.
Its a pity he is wrong.

[aussenseiter]

Unfortunately, Nitter is broken now too. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]