![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
![]() Yeah, that's the problem. The Warrior could be the stronger character on the basis of hours spent on it, but it'll almost never feel like it because for most of the leveling period it'll feel bad against level-appropriate content and it'll be hard to keep in mind that the SK would still be doing what the Warrior was doing weeks or months prior. I find it hard to recommend a Warrior to someone who doesn't want to raid. Problem here is I also find it hard to recommend a (troll!) Shadow Knight to a low-hours player. Lot of hybrids get burnt out and quit without ever reaching higher levels. The Shadow Knight is obviously what the guy wants, but does he have the time for it? Only he knows that.
Danth | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
![]() Warrior you'll level faster, but you're far more gear dependent than knights.
Knights can also solo to a decent extent, while a warrior struggles.
__________________
Brutillus 60 Dragon Hero Bracer Shadowknight - <Awakened>
| ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
![]() Well you get the troll penalty and a hybrid penalty as well. The warrior just gets the racial one.
That said, enjoy the journey. I remember seeing a SK soloing a sand giant on live during classic and almost lost my mind. Also saw one HT and smear a friend during a duel. The class was profoundly interesting and has been for 20 years (IMHO). Of all the times in life to be a pragmatist don’t be one while playing an online RPG. If you are enjoying yourself keep going. Of not, try a different path. | ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
![]() SK if you want to bind at the firepots and enjoy the game with friends.
http://wiki.project1999.com/Ring_of_the_dead Warrior if you want to dominate raid content after classic duel wield light sabers and be the envy of everyone around. Either is great, do both. | ||
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|