Fascism in the UK

[Teppler]

The UK was the original testing grounds for the Rothschild bankers. The US is 2.0. All the rot you see in the UK is coming to the US soon.

This is why you need to be fighting multi culturalism. These elites can hop from state to state after they've bled a state dry a state that you're stuck in.

[feniin]

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The UK was the original testing grounds for the Rothschild bankers. The US is 2.0. All the rot you see in the UK is coming to the US soon.

This is why you need to be fighting multi culturalism. These elites can hop from state to state after they've bled a state dry a state that you're stuck in.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] You need to be fighting the ultrawealthy, not the poor. The people coming from other countries aren't your enemies, they're your allies and fellow victims of a system that is designed to keep you poor, hungry, and dependent on the cashflow from the ultrawealthy.

[America]

Originally Posted by feniin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] You need to be fighting the ultrawealthy, not the poor. The people coming from other countries aren't your enemies, they're your allies and fellow victims of a system that is designed to keep you poor, hungry, and dependent on the cashflow from the ultrawealthy.

Fellow-victims which tend as a cohort to vote to accelerate the cancer, and who accept a nasty status quo, are a bad idea for actuating this. We need the back of our culture of individual liberty to flex. Not to add more complacent fat onto our trembling hindside.

Many natural-born White Americans are adipocytes too. It ain't about race. It ain't about race. Look away from the flashing lights, think deeper. You can manipulate a democracy's direction by manipulating its constitution of constituents [hehe]. You are with big money on immigration policy for a reason. You are not defending the weak!

If we want discourse media that allow the little guy to affect change, we well and truly need not to puritanically scrub commercial websites, with only ultra-massive companies able to regulate discussion boards adequately, to avoid being filed in the "porn" category. Imagine a world where the only collective medium of public discussion is Facebook. That is the UK now.

And the tyranny there will affect Americans as the big dogs comply to guard market share. It will be cheaper to maintain only one regime of Anglophone site moderation. British degeneracy is a scourge upon the Earth.

[kyrobo]

Originally Posted by America [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It ain't about race.

I hadn't ever heard anyone say they were opposed to multiculturalism until pretty recently. I was pretty shocked. I had always just accepted multiculturalism as part of what makes America the tits. I still more or less think that way, but I also think I get the gist of your position, and if I'm right it's really not the un-American sentiment I first assumed.

So my understanding is:
- Y'all want the melting pot America, not the salad bowl. If immigrants can't integrate with the general culture then you believe we're weaker as a country. We cease to have shared values 'n stuff.
- You're fine with limited, legal immigration. We can't take on just anyone though, and people who come here illegally and abuse our sympathies to illicitly gain from our system should be punished.

That about right?

[America]

Originally Posted by kyrobo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I hadn't ever heard anyone say they were opposed to multiculturalism until pretty recently. I was pretty shocked. I had always just accepted multiculturalism as part of what makes America the tits. I still more or less think that way, but I also think I get the gist of your position, and if I'm right it's really not the un-American sentiment I first assumed.

So my understanding is:
- Y'all want the melting pot America, not the salad bowl. If immigrants can't integrate with the general culture then you believe we're weaker as a country. We cease to have shared values 'n stuff.
- You're fine with limited, legal immigration. We can't take on just anyone though, and people who come here illegally and abuse our sympathies to illicitly gain from our system should be punished.

That about right?

This is correct but the second bullet-point seems a little too interested in vengeful thinking. I'm less about punishing and more about limiting the incidence of violation. For instance, by taking in highly skilled immigrants of backgrounds that are not super-duper conservative (like Catholic Mexicans and Islamic fundies). Also by taking in people who can demonstrate a history of entrepreneurship etc. People who are technology-literate. A little closer to an interview for admittance than an arbitrary entitlement grounded solely in humanitarian arguments.

In other words, to resurrect a selfish primary bent to our immigration system rather than using what I would argue is the current humanitarian one.

I don't really understand economics and would be very happy (& grateful to any educators who step up) to gain deeper insight than I have here. But it seems common-sense to me that bringing in smart people is better for us than bringing in dumbs.

[Caldwin]

Originally Posted by America [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If we want discourse media that allow the little guy to affect change, we well and truly need not to puritanically scrub commercial websites, with only ultra-massive companies able to regulate discussion boards adequately, to avoid being filed in the "porn" category. Imagine a world where the only collective medium of public discussion is Facebook. That is the UK now.

And the tyranny there will affect Americans as the big dogs comply to guard market share. It will be cheaper to maintain only one regime of Anglophone site moderation. British degeneracy is a scourge upon the Earth.

I agree.

I'm all for free markets. But, what we have now (at least in America) is not the free market. It's monopolistic corporations in bed with big government. This includes the media, including social media platforms, such as Facebook, twitter, youtube, etc. In order to keep their far left globalist agenda going forward, they try to silence those they disagree with. Then, when there are alternate social media platforms that promote free speech (such as gab), the hosting providers or pay platforms drop them.

I despise censorship. But that is exactly what is happening all around the world. In the US, the far left globalists are trying all they can to censor opposing voices. They twist what people say, make up lies, change history to silence alternative views. I feel we are in the beginning stages of Orwell's 1984, with political correctness being new speak (determining what words are acceptable from one moment to the next).

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Caldwin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I agree.

I'm all for free markets. But, what we have now (at least in America) is not the free market. It's monopolistic corporations in bed with big government. This includes the media, including social media platforms, such as Facebook, twitter, youtube, etc. In order to keep their far left globalist agenda going forward, they try to silence those they disagree with. Then, when there are alternate social media platforms that promote free speech (such as gab), the hosting providers or pay platforms drop them.

I despise censorship. But that is exactly what is happening all around the world. In the US, the far left globalists are trying all they can to censor opposing voices. They twist what people say, make up lies, change history to silence alternative views. I feel we are in the beginning stages of Orwell's 1984, with political correctness being new speak (determining what words are acceptable from one moment to the next).

Elizabeth Warren wants to break up Google, Amazon, and Facebook

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by feniin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] You need to be fighting the ultrawealthy, not the poor. The people coming from other countries aren't your enemies, they're your allies and fellow victims of a system that is designed to keep you poor, hungry, and dependent on the cashflow from the ultrawealthy.

That's exactly what I'm saying. Low class and low IQ minorities are weaponized by the elites. Those poor don't have the power to relocate themselves. They need elites to open up the borders. And destroy ICE. And to enable entitlement programs. In the case of the caravans, those are typically directly funded(last one by Soros non profits) which each single person costs thousands of dollars. Where is this money coming from???? Look up the ladder. These people will change demographics and laws in America to closely resemble their failing home country. And why shouldn't they if they have the opportunity and it serves them? What do they care about America's future when they got here just yesterday and they can go back to mexico tomorrow? It's on us to protect our own home state.

These multicultural elite bankers are extremely afraid of nationalists rising up against their criminal behavior. They have an incredible lobby to break up countries like America's solidarity and identity. It took them many years for them to instill a central bank in America after many of our early presidents fought tooth and nail against it. It's slow rot from here on out unless we rise up.

[Caldwin]

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

These multicultural elite bankers are extremely afraid of nationalists rising up against their criminal behavior. They have an incredible lobby to break up countries like America's solidarity and identity. It took them many years for them to instill a central bank in America after many of our early presidents fought tooth and nail against it. It's slow rot from here on out unless we rise up.

Exactly. Central banks are the scourge of the free society. They should never have bailed out the banks in 2008. They needed to be taught a lesson. Sure, we may have sunk deeper, but would have come out of it better in the end. Instead, what both Bush and Obama did will likely bite us when the next bubble happens, unless Trump is able to do something. But, I doubt that now the Democrats have the House.

[I Felt Nostalgic]

Originally Posted by I Tell The Truth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Limp as a noodle
Is Teppler's tiny thingie.
So many steroids.

Apparently, you know nothing about steroids because steroids make your dick bigger and have stronger erections. It might shrink your balls but who cares because you ain't fucking someone with your balls.