So, will Fukushima make the raid scene moot?

[mgellan]

Look at the masthead "A web portal for the ecology and for revelations about environmental war on the environment such as HAARP-chemtrails, Fukushima global nuclear false flag, and depleted uranium weapons."

Chemtrails? Not a reliable information source. As well, as soon as you see "independant scientist" as a source (ie "can't get a job as a real scientist") red flags should go up. Browsing through references listed, they are blogs that refer to other blogs that refer to other blogs... i.e. some sort of creepy enviro-alarmist echo chamber.

One guy recommends taking off your shoes and outerwear before entering your house as if this was fallout from a groundburst or something. Obviously no clues.

Typical psuedo-science. If someone publishes something like this in Nature or another reputable journal, it's time to get alarmed.

Regards,
Mg

[mgellan]

Originally Posted by Dr. Edge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm going to pass on pacific ocean sushi for the next couple hundred years.

Dead dolphins, whales and sea turtles are washing up on shore all over the world at alarming rates with signs of radiation posioning.

And like someone said if another quake or something knocks that shit loose its going to be a thousand times worse

Do you actually read the references? For example, autopsies on the the turtles showed they were killed by nets and fish hooks.

Learn some critical thinking skills, and take some of these reports with a grain of salt. Again, beware the echo chamber where people are reporting "facts" that are being reported only by others with the same opinions. None of these references appear reputable.

Regards,
Mg

[Dr. Edge]

Do you even read the reports, look at the maps and watch the news or do you just look for spelling mistakes or some other crap to discredit everything by?

Who said anything about chemtrails?

[Vadd]

Originally Posted by mgellan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you actually read the references? For example, autopsies on the the turtles showed they were killed by nets and fish hooks.

Learn some critical thinking skills, and take some of these reports with a grain of salt. Again, beware the echo chamber where people are reporting "facts" that are being reported only by others with the same opinions. None of these references appear reputable.

Regards,
Mg

are you meaning to say that you dont think the ocean is polluted enough to be killing marine life yet?

anyway, a little preparedness never hurt. you figure this type of occurrence would call for a global containment effort.... it seems way too down played for me, and there is a serious lack of transparent reporting.

i think its definitely safe to say the situation is a bit worse than any popular media outlet is directed to tell the public.

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by mgellan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

None of these references appear reputable.

Regards,
Mg

I'm trying to avoid the whole animals washing up in record numbers with radiation at this point way to much speculation like you pointed out and focus on the facts like the us ordering an assload of iodide for radiation treatment, which is simply precautionary. Another earthquake could happen at any moment so im glad were preparing in some way.

tepco is releasing a lot of information about their activities and safety measures here

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp...2/index-e.html

[phacemeltar]

you guys always arguing about pointless shit

[Dr. Edge]

Originally Posted by phacemeltar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you guys always arguing about pointless shit

yeah, the oceans are dumb

[Rhambuk]

I don't live there why should I care?

[Vadd]

Originally Posted by phacemeltar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you guys always arguing about pointless shit

confirmed Sheeple

[mgellan]

Originally Posted by Vadd [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

are you meaning to say that you dont think the ocean is polluted enough to be killing marine life yet?

anyway, a little preparedness never hurt. you figure this type of occurrence would call for a global containment effort.... it seems way too down played for me, and there is a serious lack of transparent reporting.

i think its definitely safe to say the situation is a bit worse than any popular media outlet is directed to tell the public.

What? Marine life die all the time from pollution, you're trying to move the goalposts when I pointed out the apparent evidence was not evidence at all. The claim is that Fukushima is releasing radiation and will be an extinction level event.

A little preparedness for the wrong thing definitely hurts! Something of this nature WOULD call for a global containment effort. Just because you're ignorant of the real situation and choose to get your data from total whackjob media sources and not from real scientists is why you notice a lack of attention. The media don't report on something just because the tinfoil hat brigade is obsessing on it...

Regards,
Mg