![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
love that woody gif
| ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
I bet I can guess what DSM is gonna say
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
| ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
I have never in my life witnessed someone cling so strongly to an obviously wrong opinion with garbage arguments to support it before. It's wild to watch. Every time people point out how bad his reasoning is and he doubles down without saying anything new it continues to shock me. I don't know why it shocks me anymore. I guess I just expect people to have some semblance of reason. Silly me.
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | |||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | |||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
![]() |
|
|