![]() |
#131
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
No it is your choice to add a 'grieveance' petition after the rules were properly followed. The theme of my fellow AW posters in this thread is simple: What more should we have done? I have yet to really see an answer because it seems the moment this accident ( that has been apologized for by OPmeter) occurred we had no way to correct it. Your response here is very tellsing, basically its your 'just desserts' for years of 'bad things' but how in the world is that suppose to be viable for guilds to correct mistakes and move forward for the better. It seems grudges are the main theme in this raid scene and while everyone wants to say the right thing to each other, all we really do is scan hours of Everquest fraps footage looking for any disturbances in the matrix. There is no justice being served here, what rule was broken that had no correct follow up action to warrant a month off? All the answers to this question involve previous accepted norms when it comes to interactions between A/A and any other guild. We are not bad guys, we simply raid more than anyone else. When you raid more, more shit tends to happen bc Everquest happens. P99 will forever be remembered as Petition99, which is pretty sad tbh.
__________________
Eratani / Cleratani / Eratou / Stabatani / Flopatani / Eratii
| |||
|
#132
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
I am not asking for the world, I am just asking you to concede that P99 should have room for people that don't enjoy playing the fast shoot fast trigger game you do - instead of forcing us to go down this route (and you have, if not personally, I can't even begin to count all the times A/A officers have told me "if its a problem, file a petition", and now that we are doing that, its ALSO a problem) - what are we supposed to do?
__________________
| |||
|
#133
|
|||
|
![]() Its just a difference of cultures, A/A pretty much have to deal with each other on a raid to raid basis, so when either of them screw up, they usually get into tells and work out some sort of agreement so it doesn't become a petition issue. While I wouldn't say the relationship is great, there is communication between them to work things out and come to some sort of compromise.
Usually like a "we screwed this up so you can have the next 2-4 of x_raidtarget uncontested by us". Basically 2 nuclear powered entities with a direct phone line to each other that doesn't require the outside powers to mediate (for the most part, sometimes agreements cant be worked and the petitionquest happens). Now you have another guild(s) added to the equation that doesn't have the same communication styles or speed dial to the other guilds to work things out and it immediately goes to petition quest. When AW pulled the 'AW concedes" on Fesh, After Eashan was zooted out, there should have been a concerted effort by leadership from both AW/CSG to work out some sort of additional concession agreement instead of petitioning. Personally I think that guild suspensions should max out at 20 days, suspend the individual members who caused the issue/train on an incrementally increasing days off (20/40/60days,etc) and try to limit the power of the pull teams. As it stands right now, With AW sitting at a 30day, AM will likely eat a 30 day on their next infraction, there is no real reason for the non A/A guilds to try and work things out. | ||
|
#134
|
|||
|
![]() Petition should all be made on the raid forum in a public manner so everyone can see whenever a petition is made and for what.
Also , CSG have been given so many bones its funny listening to Culkasi complain about not getting room for the little guy. You were literally just handed a free Eashan and then petitioned 1 of the guilds that messaged you to come kill it. You think youre going to get a better response from A/A leaders now? Shady shit bro. | ||
|
#135
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
We never ask for any guild to be banned, we always ask to be left alone when we once in a while target a mob. This was one of those times, and this time we got rolled over by a guild who doesn't care, because they had to kill a mob they also don't really care for after having killed hundreds of times, because of some desire to "win" over another guild who has also killed it hundreds of times.....that was a 90 minute waste of 50-60 peoples time - the number of man hours there is staggering. Call them wellfare pixels, call it an investment, call it whatever you want - let the casaul guilds on P99 see some content without having to play like you do, and I am sure you will only get each other banned going forward.
__________________
| |||
|
#136
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Eratani / Cleratani / Eratou / Stabatani / Flopatani / Eratii
| |||
|
#137
|
|||
|
![]() When two guilds have made a conscious decisions that they are going to go after every single raid mob, every single cycle, every single week, what would you recommend the staff do to persuade you to let some others enjoy raid content and stop gearing your 4th alt? What others guilds outside of A/A raid every single raid monsters every single week? Answer - None. Response - Sirken discouraging farming content for the sake of farming content
| ||
|
#138
|
|||
|
![]() Also, "conceding" doesn't work in a 3+ guild environment. A/A can just concede the next 2-4 of whatever when they screw up because the other guild will accept that with 99.9% certainty they will be killing said mob on the next 2-4 cycles. If Awakened concedes Feshlak, what the fuck does that do for CSG? Tell me the odds of CSG killing even one of the next 2-4 Feshlaks that Aftermath know Awakened has conceded.
No, thats right, I thought so.
__________________
| ||
|
#140
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|