Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Resolved Issues

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-20-2010, 02:28 AM
girth girth is offline
Fire Giant

girth's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas, Y'all
Posts: 793
Default

Just for shits and giggles I went outside Guk and let one of the entrance guards beat on me for 10 minutes, I never once moved after walking up to him and hitting Taunt once. I had no buffs on.

level 37 ogre sk vs green con guk entrance guard
1430 hp
700 ac
185 defense
125 dodge
175 parry
175 riposte

eqlog_Bootleg_project1999.txt

I found it interesting that I only got 0 dodges, 0 ripostes and 1 parry. Is it because the npc miss check comes before those so they barely even have a chance to happen?
__________________
Girth Matters (Retired)
50 Ogre Shadow Knight

Mugatoo <Center For Ants>
45 Iksar Monk

"You can all go to hell, I'm going to Texas."
Last edited by girth; 05-20-2010 at 02:31 AM..
  #2  
Old 05-20-2010, 03:15 AM
President President is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by girth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just for shits and giggles I went outside Guk and let one of the entrance guards beat on me for 10 minutes, I never once moved after walking up to him and hitting Taunt once. I had no buffs on.

level 37 ogre sk vs green con guk entrance guard
1430 hp
700 ac
185 defense
125 dodge
175 parry
175 riposte

eqlog_Bootleg_project1999.txt

I found it interesting that I only got 0 dodges, 0 ripostes and 1 parry. Is it because the npc miss check comes before those so they barely even have a chance to happen?
Id say that assumption makes sense girth.
  #3  
Old 05-20-2010, 10:13 AM
Yoite Yoite is offline
Fire Giant

Yoite's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 658
Default

ya if they miss you there is no reason for you to dodge, parry, or riposte their missed attack.
__________________
Team Bonghits
  #4  
Old 05-20-2010, 10:58 AM
pickled_heretic pickled_heretic is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 982
Default

A lot of you guys keep saying "QQ JOIN A GROUP N00BIE," but nobody's going to want to group with a warrior who can't hold aggro because he can't hit anything and can't do anything to increase his chance to hit. I'm spoiled because I am a SK and I can hold aggro just with disease cloud and my spells regardless of my DPS, but warriors are fucked.
  #5  
Old 05-20-2010, 11:26 AM
YendorLootmonkey YendorLootmonkey is offline
Planar Protector

YendorLootmonkey's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Surefall Glade
Posts: 2,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pickled_heretic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
A lot of you guys keep saying "QQ JOIN A GROUP N00BIE," but nobody's going to want to group with a warrior who can't hold aggro because he can't hit anything and can't do anything to increase his chance to hit. I'm spoiled because I am a SK and I can hold aggro just with disease cloud and my spells regardless of my DPS, but warriors are fucked.
Well, I was trying to steer him towards 1H weapons before. IMO, for grouping, he needs a pair of tentacle whips or gnoll-hide lariats or something cheap with a proc that pisses mobs off.
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:

"You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles
  #6  
Old 05-20-2010, 11:08 AM
PearlJammzz PearlJammzz is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 224
Default

Ya I hate having warriors as tanks as a DPS. It's tough to fill like you're giving it your all when you wait till 80 % to nuke, and you already have aggro.

SK's you can quite literally wait till they get a disease cloud, and a taunt or 2 off, and nuke at will. Maybe the SK's I have grouped with are just better than the warriors? I don't know, but I do know that warriors have a hell of a time keeping aggro. We'll see if this changes in Kunark [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.].
  #7  
Old 05-20-2010, 11:14 AM
Kainzo Kainzo is offline
Sarnak

Kainzo's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 254
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PearlJammzz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ya I hate having warriors as tanks as a DPS. It's tough to fill like you're giving it your all when you wait till 80 % to nuke, and you already have aggro.

SK's you can quite literally wait till they get a disease cloud, and a taunt or 2 off, and nuke at will. Maybe the SK's I have grouped with are just better than the warriors? I don't know, but I do know that warriors have a hell of a time keeping aggro. We'll see if this changes in Kunark [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.].
taunt doesnt "build" aggro. It places the user on top of the aggro list, if they are already at the top, taunt is worthless.
__________________
Lord Kainzo
GM of Disposable Heroes
҉Are you Disposable?҉
  #8  
Old 05-20-2010, 11:19 AM
guineapig guineapig is offline
Planar Protector

guineapig's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,028
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kainzo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
taunt doesnt "build" aggro. It places the user on top of the aggro list, if they are already at the top, taunt is worthless.
^^^ This

Who still doesn't understand how taunt works?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Server chat is for civil conversation. Personal attacks/generally being confrontational will not be tolerated.
  #9  
Old 05-20-2010, 11:26 AM
PearlJammzz PearlJammzz is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 224
Default

Then it's the damage he deals or something. My point is the SK grabs it once, and can hold it forever easily. Warriors have no chance. You have to play like a half-afk gimp lots of the time if you have a warrior tank.

Best way to control aggro is through root if you can. The warrior then only needs to be the closest to the mob, and he will hold aggro forever. This is the only way I have seen warriors be able to hold good aggro.
  #10  
Old 05-20-2010, 11:47 AM
guineapig guineapig is offline
Planar Protector

guineapig's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,028
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PearlJammzz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Best way to control aggro is through root if you can. The warrior then only needs to be the closest to the mob, and he will hold aggro forever. This is the only way I have seen warriors be able to hold good aggro.

This is actually a really bad habbit to get into. Root will break multiple times during a fight and it generates a whole mess of aggro. The moment the root breaks that mob will start attacking the person who rooted it and the warrior needs to re-establish control.

The more you root, the higher you get on the aggro list. The warrior doesn't actually have aggro in this case, the mob is simply defaulting to hitting whatever it can until it can finally move again. If you try using root like this on a raid you will either die often or piss off the backup healers.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Server chat is for civil conversation. Personal attacks/generally being confrontational will not be tolerated.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.