A Bruised Universe?

[Ahldagor]

keeping an eye out for more on this. really cool.

[Bardalicious]

Simply put, this is just one of thousands of theories based upon observational data. It isn't some brand new discovery that redefines the way in which we view the universe nor the origin of it.

I can't recall which video at the moment, but the microwave background data supports another theory in which there are multiple planes of existence which are continually expanding and contracting. These planes occasionally converge at points, creating new "big bangs" at those overlapping points.

It's an interesting theory. But a theory nonetheless. The truth of the matter is that there is no definitive explanation of what those background mappings mean. Yet, anyways.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Bardalicious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I can't recall which video at the moment, but the microwave background data supports another theory in which there are multiple planes of existence which are continually expanding and contracting. These planes occasionally converge at points, creating new "big bangs" at those overlapping points.

That's this. You should read before you spew.

[Bardalicious]

Sure isn't.

Nor does that detract from the fact that this is a theory. Also, this is the internet. Stop pretending like you're the only motherfucker that ever sees any of this shit before you regurgitate it and post it back here. It doesn't make you seem intelligent. It doesn't impress anyone.

Besides, shouldn't you be masturbating vigorously to tranny porn right now?

[Korisek]

Originally Posted by Bardalicious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nor does that detract from the fact that this is a theory.

"Theory" doesn't actually mean "baseless assumption" in scientific lingo like it does in the public vernacular. "Gravity" is still a theory despite its existence being pretty much universally acknowledged, for instance, primarily because our understanding of it is STILL incomplete.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Korisek [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Theory" doesn't actually mean "baseless assumption" in scientific lingo like it does in the public vernacular. "Gravity" is still a theory despite its existence being pretty much universally acknowledged, for instance, primarily because our understanding of it is STILL incomplete.

Careful.

Gravity isn't really a thing. It's a side effect of an interaction between fundamental forces.