Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: Is variance still needed?
Yes, it promotes "competition" 75 29.18%
No, its an unneccesary non-classic time sink 182 70.82%
Voters: 257. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 12-17-2009, 11:04 AM
halfofalmost halfofalmost is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 20
Default

a GM enforced rotation is garbage.

People will devote their time in different ways when it comes to being considered the biggest dick in EverQuest.

The whole calling out another guild on them being zerg-like because of their devotion to the game (albeit by numbers or willingness to camp a mob for "14 hours") is two-sided.

IB allegedly has the better gear and was first to triumph over Nagafen mainly due to the devotion, and TIME spent getting there, of its core players leading up until the actual event itself (i.e. exp, farming gear in SolB, LGuk, leveling etc.)

The true elite in EQ were always the players who played the most (which /TYPICALLY/ = skill). They had the most HP and Mana.

The Rathe had shit like this going on, but it was actually worth something back in 1999. They ended up doing a calendar based on what the guilds would allow (Mostly KEG/CIW/MFH) the other guilds would get their chances etc. But with Kunark still several months away, I think there's plenty of time for two guilds to hammer out the details themselves.

Yea my post jumps all over the place, its 9am and I haven't played in like a month.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.