A Word of Encouragement to New Players

[Korisek]

Originally Posted by Dirtnap [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just make sure you play a class that is desirable. If you play a hybrid you will get passed up for many groups if they can snag a non hybrid.

Apparently tanks of any kind are such a low population that people are perfectly happy with paladins and SKs as it means they don't need to rely on shaman/ranger tanking.

But that's only what I've heard anyway, I haven't leveled my paladin past 9 yet.

[Beaniron]

Originally Posted by Korisek [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Apparently tanks of any kind are such a low population that people are perfectly happy with paladins and SKs as it means they don't need to rely on shaman/ranger tanking.

But that's only what I've heard anyway, I haven't leveled my paladin past 9 yet.

Well, Warrior tanks ARE preferred because of their higher damage mitigation and damage output, but Paladins and SK's are better at spike aggro thanks to ED/Blind/Stuns, and therefore have an easier time maintaining aggro without good weapons.

[Dirtnap]

Originally Posted by Korisek [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Apparently tanks of any kind are such a low population that people are perfectly happy with paladins and SKs as it means they don't need to rely on shaman/ranger tanking.

But that's only what I've heard anyway, I haven't leveled my paladin past 9 yet.

What people say, and what people do are totally different. People say on the forum and ingame that they would gladly take anyone good at their class, but a good Ranger will never do more DPS than a good Rogue. So they will skip a Ranger to get a Rogue, even if he was waiting an hour to join the group.

EDIT: Same thing with a Warrior and Paladin/SK.

[SCB]

Originally Posted by Dirtnap [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What people say, and what people do are totally different. People say on the forum and ingame that they would gladly take anyone good at their class, but a good Ranger will never do more DPS than a good Rogue. So they will skip a Ranger to get a Rogue, even if he was waiting an hour to join the group.

EDIT: Same thing with a Warrior and Paladin/SK.

There is never a situation in which the dps difference between a rogue and a ranger is even remotely relevant to 99% of groups on this server.. Every group outgears content by such a ridiculous margin that min/maxing your group to take on the content is beyond absurd. Mobs explode seconds after the group targets them, and wipes are almost entirely related to pulls gone wrong, an enchanter pet going haywire, or someone breaking cc.

Now, the exp penalty, on the other hand, will dissuade some groups. Can't do much about those kinds of people.

[webrunner5]

The xp penalty in my opinion is WAY over hyped. If you don't have a tank and a big fat Ogre SK shows up he is in. Or even a uglier Troll SK shows up guess what, He is in. You are not going to sit there for a hour waiting for one of 20 Warriors in the game to show up. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] By then the group would break up. And if it is a Guildie you sure as hell am not going to turn them down.

I know it does make a difference XP wise but hell it is just part of the game.