![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Is variance still needed? | |||
Yes, it promotes "competition" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
75 | 29.18% |
No, its an unneccesary non-classic time sink |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
182 | 70.82% |
Voters: 257. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
I work and have a family and this is great. It will flood some items in the economy, but it wont destroy it. If anything this will gear us up for vel, it will induce end game players to gear out to the max and force them through bordom to reroll alts wich will increase population. Nothing like lfg as a casual with no one in your lvl range. <3 Rogean current raid scene is a cluster FUK, 150 people on a Friday night waiting for trak to spawn. To lose the spawn to FTE to the guild with the least amount of people on spawn, who normally would not be able to do the encounter without the 2 larger guilds plvling there raid scene. GG | |||
|
#3
|
||||
|
![]() Bump for the future!
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
| |||
|
#4
|
|||||
|
![]() Quote:
Rogean = Obama
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
#5
|
|||
|
![]() I feel that this is an unclassic step. Correct me if I'm wrong.
This is an odd solution for a problem generated by arbitrary rules. The only reason you need the raiding rules is because people were being assholes, or one guild was camping all the monsters. You know what, that's fine. Because the solution is for the player to join or fight or compromise with the top guilds. I don't believe in care bears, it's a stupid term. I do believe that people get upset and would like easier solutions to problems that are made simply because they didn't get what they wanted. In summary, fuck raiding rules, make people solve the issues themselves, this is everquest the original, not a fucking modern day power to the player mmo. Play nice policy? Sure, don't train people, don't be retarded. Solutions to the people who are complaining? Sure, but only if you're really really tired of hearing them complain and they won't compromise, join or fight. TL;DR Don't give in, remove all rules but play nice policy and make the players work with the guilds that are doing the killing. If you're trying to remove tracking of monsters, (Real time in-game person all up in the nerd on their computer) then that's dumb, because that's a person putting in dedicated nerd time to empower their guild and themselves. I've never done tracking, I don't play on blue, this is just my thoughts. | ||
Last edited by McMuffins; 11-12-2012 at 06:17 PM..
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
![]() I can imagine following:
Rogean broadcasts: "Good morning TMO! Weekly raid-boss lottery have assign you following raid targets for this week: Lord Nagafen, Venril Sathir, and .... (drums)... Fippy Darkpaw! Enjoy your stay at P99!" [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||
|
#7
|
|||||
|
![]() Quote:
Rogean gives 0ducks.
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
#8
|
||||
|
![]() No, that is not what I was suggesting at all.
Something like: /guildraidtarget Trakanon /gu Project1999 tells the guild, Trakanon has spawned! The theory here is that small guilds would get a bit of automated tracking done for them is all. That would in no way guarantee them the kill, in fact it probably would not.
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
| |||
|
#9
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#10
|
|||
|
![]() Can we get an update to the server raid rule posts? Having to distill 30 different threads with 4 different GMs/Guides previous rulings and statements is getting quite confusing.
| ||
|
![]() |
|
|