possible to adjust loot tables to guild size?

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think OP has some great ideas, and I'm sure the development team will give those ideas the time and attention they deserve!

/chuckle

[Swish]

I can see his point, but there were 101 better ways to approach the thread... the idea is what's causing the rustled jimmies I think.

[Ele]

Blade of carnage sucks anyway.

But if this got implemented just disband guild and use shout and vent. Lol

[Ele]

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Gauge the system more please.

Also WTF does TMO need with Naggy? It's not bad enough they have enough lvl 60's to camp the server, they also have 33+ lvl 52's parked in SolB? For shame.

Fun raid. Play to have fun yeah?

Also bladestoppers, need more bladestoppers.

[cyryllis]

actually we do need more bladestoppers, or we wouldnt spend hundreds of K buying the few that ever hit the market. also, did you never play classic eq? nothing here is different. If a raid is called, what do we do? Tell members not to come to the raid? Sorry, we have the 20 people needed for the raid, I know you want to participate but it will make our numbers look too high for some scrub that forumquests instead of doing anything in game.

What a poorly thought out, cry baby thread.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by cyryllis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

actually we do need more bladestoppers, or we wouldnt spend hundreds of K buying the few that ever hit the market. also, did you never play classic eq? nothing here is different.

You get hit in the head between then and now? In classic every guild including the top one had to clear to Naggy just like everyone else. Let the adults do the talking now please. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[cyryllis]

lol we do clear to naggy, but good try. quick, come back and give a better retort! (despite the fact I was referring to turning away members at raids)

[Tasslehofp99]

There isn't enough logic in the world to defend what tmo has turned p99 into.



Its good to see others finally voice their frustration, unfortunately though there won't be any changes made which inconvenience TMO. For example in VP recently FE was able to learn how TMO was avoiding trains by using z axis exploits. We used there z axis exploit to pull and engage a dragon unhindered, and the very next day GMs announced that using safe z axis spots was no longer allowed.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by cyryllis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol we do clear to naggy, but good try. quick, come back and give a better retort! (despite the fact I was referring to turning away members at raids)

Oh so logging in 33 alts camped at the fire giant bridge and killing 2-4 mobs before engaging him is considered "clearing" now? My mistake. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[xarzzardorn]

Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There isn't enough logic in the world to defend what tmo has turned p99 into.



Its good to see others finally voice their frustration, unfortunately though there won't be any changes made which inconvenience TMO. For example in VP recently FE was able to learn how TMO was avoiding trains by using z axis exploits. We used there z axis exploit to pull and engage a dragon unhindered, and the very next day GMs announced that using safe z axis spots was no longer allowed.

lol