Patch Notes July 05, 2010

[finalgrunt]

When you say "We're still having to nerf things, sorry, thats just the way it is.", what do you have in mind Nilbog?

Cause for the pets I completly agreed with the changes. But I don't really see what else is different from classic now.

And yes fix pet healing causing threat then please. Will help lower level magicians a ton.

[Insedeel]

Originally Posted by finalgrunt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And yes fix pet healing causing threat then please. Will help lower level magicians a ton.

I doubt they'll do anything based off what we say here, but those of you that also remember the pet healing threat thing, the more people we have responding in the thread confirming what I've posted in the bugs section, I think the more chance we have of it being added to their list. Although I hope with my link and information I provided will be enough proof for them that this was truly the case.

Link to my bug report here.

[Haynar]

Originally Posted by finalgrunt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And yes fix pet healing causing threat then please. Will help lower level magicians a ton.

Yes, pet healing is just borked. It will be adjusted. The other thing I will be looking at is Necro/SK lifetaps. If I remember, they caused way more aggro on the server acting as if you healed yourself. They basically worked as AE aggro. I know without a doubt, that lifetaps did not work like this.

Haynar

[Cronoclops]

Let me get this right. You knew putting in the fix that you did and not the rest of what you knew needed to go in would unfairly effect the majority of pet class players? Then you did it anyway leaving all those players to hang until you could get around to it? Am I missing something or reading this wrong?

[Haynar]

Originally Posted by Cronoclops [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let me get this right. You knew putting in the fix that you did and not the rest of what you knew needed to go in would unfairly effect the majority of pet class players? Then you did it anyway leaving all those players to hang until you could get around to it? Am I missing something or reading this wrong?

So we have one vote, for leaving pet classes broke for awhile.

Maybe I should start a poll.

[Kiwaukee]

Originally Posted by Haynar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So we have one vote, for leaving pet classes broke for awhile.

Maybe I should start a poll.

It's not that he's wanting pets to stay "broken" (read: not exactly classic), he's saying that it wasn't exactly fair to partially change it and essentially put in all the "negative" adjustments and leave out the "positives" that needed to be fixed also. By doing so, those who are in the level range of the broken damage tables are left with a doubly gimped pet that they can't properly heal without pulling agro.

[finalgrunt]

Originally Posted by Kiwaukee [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's not that he's wanting pets to stay "broken" (read: not exactly classic), he's saying that it wasn't exactly fair to partially change it and essentially put in all the "negative" adjustments and leave out the "positives" that needed to be fixed also. By doing so, those who are in the level range of the broken damage tables are left with a doubly gimped pet that they can't properly heal without pulling agro.

Pet regen was fixed. So you can't say only negative stuff was added.

[Cronoclops]

Originally Posted by Haynar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So we have one vote, for leaving pet classes broke for awhile.

Maybe I should start a poll.

That's what you got out of my question?