Quote:
Originally Posted by AenarieFenninRo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is compounded by the statement:
While I'm a nice guy and will take your statement at face value that you're not saying "who did what" Merkk, posting the second video with the first implies that you're stating the second was also the same people who did the first. To add to that the quote about positioning, which FE has blasted TMO for in the past, this is consistent with a fallacy called poisoning the well.
Because I am taking your statement at face value that you're not trying to be biased, my suggestion for the future would be that next time post the videos into separate threads, and ask people to then watch, and ask who in the video did what. They may not be able to say names, but they can say "the guy in the blue robe with the white helm / mask"
At that point, people are drawing their own conclusions, not the conclusions you're pointing them toward.
|
I see, I should of posted 2 thread as to not draw stuff towards the 2 TMO in the first video?
Its hard to separate own personal bias. I do agree maybe I could of done the post differently as to not direct attention towards them, wasn't my intention to correlate that the people in first vid are responsible for the 2nd video, guess I didn't make that clear enough.
Thanks for elaborating on that point. I am not perfect and do accept your points 100%. I was just trying to paint how I felt + let other draw evidence from what I gathered, I do not have much of a story from the TMO side as there is 2 sides to every story. So I understand how the onlooker could draw that the first video's culprits are directly correlated to what happens in the second.