TMO / BDA - Raid Alliance

[Frieza_Prexus]

Originally Posted by Woahnelly [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Stupid iPhone! As I was saying, if you disagree with the shady shit that your guild does, why not denounce it? anytime a TMO member is caught blatantly exploiting, other members just dance around it or change the subject. You want a better server? Don't stand for this shit. The rules are obvious in this case, does no one in TMO have a moral code?

I thought had made my stance clear. My apologies if I did not..

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus

Everyone has an absolute right and a reason to be upset about it. It's clearly a broken situation

Also, I denounced a similar use here:

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...&postcount=686
Aiaus should be clearly punished.

But I questioned the fairness of banning that particular individual for very specific reasons which, ultimately, proved rather...controversial. Those arguments can be found in the same thread.

Originally Posted by Woahnelly

if you disagree with the shady shit that your guild does, why not denounce it

I try and make it a point to do so whenever I feel it is appropriate. For example, what the individuals in question have apparently done with their IP exemptions was wrong. I like both of them a lot, and I respect their immense contributions to the guild, so please forgive me if I'm a bit light on the individual public floggings. Sometimes behaviors can be better changed with a fair amount of internal diplomacy, and I think that my goals of growing TMO as a fair and professional organization are more often better served without publicly singling individuals out.

It appears that someone has been caught red handed after being explicitly informed of the consequences, yet those clear ramifications were not applied. There is perhaps a satisfactory explanation to the situation's resolution, but there is, at the very least, an appearance of impropriety and inconsistency that should be dealt with.

To state it very clearly: I believe the community is absolutely right to have an extremely valid concern about the legitimacy of the server's rules enforcement in light of how such an apparent violation was seemingly handled.