Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames
Reload this Page TMO or FE, which to choose?
Home Forums Register Members List Today's Posts

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-01-2013, 07:38 PM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,529
Default
I'm sure it'll be fun and all but like get your own thread, assholes
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #2  
Old 04-01-2013, 07:42 PM
Frieza_Prexus Frieza_Prexus is offline
Fire Giant

Frieza_Prexus's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Houston, TX.
Posts: 750
Default
Question: Under what theory of absolution would Rogean's opinion or actions eliminate an obligation, and how is it being applied here?

Is it being claimed that Rogean has the authority to dissolve obligations by right of his status, or is the claim simply that he revealed information that displayed fraud within the bet, but not that he himself has acted in a decision making capacity?

What are the exact mechanics of the invalidation?
__________________
Xasten <The Mystical Order>
Frieza <Stasis> 1999-2003 Prexus
"I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." JOHN 14:6
  #3  
Old 04-01-2013, 07:44 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Question: Under what theory of absolution would Rogean's opinion or actions eliminate an obligation, and how is it being applied here?

Is it being claimed that Rogean has the authority to dissolve obligations by right of his status, or is the claim simply that he revealed information that displayed fraud within the bet, but not that he himself has acted in a decision making capacity?

What are the exact mechanics of the invalidation?
Lol finally! Someone caught on. The whole rogean invalidated my bet was just making light of some post Rogean made that FE thought let Mortiiss off the hook. Rogean pointed out that someone made a bet offer after an action happened. Thereby insinuating the the bet presenter had foreknowledge. However, foreknowledge does not make a bet invalid.

I figure if Rogean having an interaction with a bet scenario invalidates a bet... then why not this time.

Its just dumb FE members being dumb.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #4  
Old 04-01-2013, 07:51 PM
Nerosys Nerosys is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 208
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lol finally! Someone caught on. The whole rogean invalidated my bet was just making light of some post Rogean made that FE thought let Mortiiss off the hook. Rogean pointed out that someone made a bet offer after an action happened. Thereby insinuating the the bet presenter had foreknowledge. However, foreknowledge does not make a bet invalid.

I figure if Rogean having an interaction with a bet scenario invalidates a bet... then why not this time.

Its just dumb FE members being dumb.
Translation ...
You made a bet, got caught with your dick in your mouth and its taken you 3 weeks to come up with this piss poor excuse got it.
  #5  
Old 04-01-2013, 08:26 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerosys [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Translation ...
You made a bet, got caught with your dick in your mouth and its taken you 3 weeks to come up with this piss poor excuse got it.
Incorrect.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #6  
Old 04-01-2013, 08:04 PM
Daldolma Daldolma is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 645
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lol finally! Someone caught on. The whole rogean invalidated my bet was just making light of some post Rogean made that FE thought let Mortiiss off the hook. Rogean pointed out that someone made a bet offer after an action happened. Thereby insinuating the the bet presenter had foreknowledge. However, foreknowledge does not make a bet invalid.

I figure if Rogean having an interaction with a bet scenario invalidates a bet... then why not this time.

Its just dumb FE members being dumb.
holy shit, the above is so stupid that it can't even be rationally discussed
  #7  
Old 04-01-2013, 08:14 PM
maverixdamighty maverixdamighty is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 942
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
holy shit, the above is so stupid that it can't even be rationally discussed
alarti being stupid and a POS? Go figure.
  #8  
Old 04-01-2013, 08:26 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
holy shit, the above is so stupid that it can't even be rationally discussed
Just because you don't have the mental facilities to discuss something rationally does not mean it can't be rationally discussed.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #9  
Old 04-01-2013, 11:47 PM
Godefroi Godefroi is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 406
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just because you don't have the mental facilities to discuss something rationally does not mean it can't be rationally discussed.
Stop being coming back like a 3rd grade.

Did you pay yet bitch ?
  #10  
Old 04-02-2013, 05:04 AM
BigLe2e BigLe2e is offline
Skeleton

BigLe2e's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 19
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
. Thereby insinuating the the bet presenter had foreknowledge. However, foreknowledge does not make a bet invalid.
Yeah, tell that to Tim Donaghy.
__________________
Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 AM.

Privacy Policy - Project 1999 - Classic Everquest - Archive - Top

Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC. 		Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.