TMO or FE, which to choose?

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by falkun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

1) My sig has nothing to do with your "invalidated" bet, derp.
2) I'm ready to go down the "who lies more" road whenever you are. After you...

Nah you start it off. Find lies =) Bet you can't!

[quido]

jesus christ not again you fuckin losers - shut up

take it to pms and keep our precious thread pure

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

jesus christ not again you fuckin losers - shut up

take it to pms and keep our precious thread pure

No this is a good subject, trust me. Mav is guaranteed to get spun up and rage post 100 more times.

[quido]

I'm sure it'll be fun and all but like get your own thread, assholes

[Frieza_Prexus]

Question: Under what theory of absolution would Rogean's opinion or actions eliminate an obligation, and how is it being applied here?

Is it being claimed that Rogean has the authority to dissolve obligations by right of his status, or is the claim simply that he revealed information that displayed fraud within the bet, but not that he himself has acted in a decision making capacity?

What are the exact mechanics of the invalidation?

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Question: Under what theory of absolution would Rogean's opinion or actions eliminate an obligation, and how is it being applied here?

Is it being claimed that Rogean has the authority to dissolve obligations by right of his status, or is the claim simply that he revealed information that displayed fraud within the bet, but not that he himself has acted in a decision making capacity?

What are the exact mechanics of the invalidation?

Lol finally! Someone caught on. The whole rogean invalidated my bet was just making light of some post Rogean made that FE thought let Mortiiss off the hook. Rogean pointed out that someone made a bet offer after an action happened. Thereby insinuating the the bet presenter had foreknowledge. However, foreknowledge does not make a bet invalid.

I figure if Rogean having an interaction with a bet scenario invalidates a bet... then why not this time.

Its just dumb FE members being dumb.

[Nerosys]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol finally! Someone caught on. The whole rogean invalidated my bet was just making light of some post Rogean made that FE thought let Mortiiss off the hook. Rogean pointed out that someone made a bet offer after an action happened. Thereby insinuating the the bet presenter had foreknowledge. However, foreknowledge does not make a bet invalid.

I figure if Rogean having an interaction with a bet scenario invalidates a bet... then why not this time.

Its just dumb FE members being dumb.

Translation ...
You made a bet, got caught with your dick in your mouth and its taken you 3 weeks to come up with this piss poor excuse got it.

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol finally! Someone caught on. The whole rogean invalidated my bet was just making light of some post Rogean made that FE thought let Mortiiss off the hook. Rogean pointed out that someone made a bet offer after an action happened. Thereby insinuating the the bet presenter had foreknowledge. However, foreknowledge does not make a bet invalid.

I figure if Rogean having an interaction with a bet scenario invalidates a bet... then why not this time.

Its just dumb FE members being dumb.

holy shit, the above is so stupid that it can't even be rationally discussed

[BigLe2e]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

. Thereby insinuating the the bet presenter had foreknowledge. However, foreknowledge does not make a bet invalid.

Yeah, tell that to Tim Donaghy.

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Question: Under what theory of absolution would Rogean's opinion or actions eliminate an obligation, and how is it being applied here?

Is it being claimed that Rogean has the authority to dissolve obligations by right of his status, or is the claim simply that he revealed information that displayed fraud within the bet, but not that he himself has acted in a decision making capacity?

What are the exact mechanics of the invalidation?

rogean provided info that proved the bet was actually won by mortiiss, albeit on a technicality

in reality he was pretty much trolling tiggles for making a fraudulent bet

either way, it has nothing to do with alarti being a known scammer to the community. as a member of his guild, your inaction must be assumed to mean you either share his lack of integrity or tacitly support it