![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
Unfortunately, the 'experience stealing' aspect of this recent change will make inviting a hybrid to a group less desirable. I leveled my Paladin to 50 in the first couple of months of the server being opened, and tackled the penalty myself by putting in the additional required time (mostly duoing with a bard). When I chose to play a Paladin, I understood that more leveling time would be required. However, by making a hybrid in the present post-patch day, one can mitigate the penalty by joining large groups...by sucking experience points. This is hardly the same kind of sacrifice that one chooses to make if they were to take on the experience penalty by themselves (which is disappointing). | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
so while other classes can exp even faster than before, hybrids have been nerfed on exp AND arent willingly accepted in groups as they where before
just for the sake of being classic... | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is a detrimental change to the server and does not encourage growth. It alienates the hybrids. Would be different if hybrids could effectively solo, but we're not necros/druids/enchanters/mages. Classic was about creating and establishing an in-game community. The devs made that stronger by removing the global ooc/auc channels. Now you actually have to create and maintain relationships with people you meet, send /tells to people LFG, congregate in the EC tunnel to buy/sell... that's what made classic great. So why rip off that band-aid only to put in something that weakens the community? People should be encouraged to group. Hell, put in the group XP bonuses too... imagine a world where people are actually seeking out that 5th or 6th person for their group! How can that not make the server community BETTER? Sony had to fix this after the data came out on the group sharing of penalties. This data has already come out here by virtue of the fact we already knew about it from its revelation back in the day, so technically if you follow that timeline, the groupshare penalty fix must be put in.
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:
![]() "You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles | |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ht=group+bonus http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ht=group+bonus http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ht=group+bonus But you bring up a good point... one of the sole purposes of the no boxing rule is to promote grouping. Clearly that is important to the devs, as it has been one of the most contentious decisions on the server that it seems like they have to constantly defend. Yet, boxing was classic. They've knowingly deviated from "what is classic" in order to promote grouping, and therefore the health of the server. I find it a bit hypocritical that they would put in a detriment to grouping by forcing the group to share the hybrid XP penalties when clearly they could make another decision that was contradictory to the "classicness" of the server in order to promote grouping, and therefore the health of the server.
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:
![]() "You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|