Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-19-2013, 05:15 AM
Llodd Llodd is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Pretty sure he said if a few of those guilds merged they could compete for the mobs. If you feel that means zerging that's your perception, or if you look at it rationally it could just mean that if you have a guild of 40 ppl and you merge with a guild of 40 ppl then it's more likely you could field 30-40 ppl to kill raid mobs when it pops. Just curious what is your raiding experience here on P99?
How do they compete for the mobs? They have to poopsock and 24/7 track/batphone
Which requires stupidly large guilds with enough able to log in at a moments notice.

Now there are other alternatives to that, but unfortunately they require server cooperation. Something to which this thread pertains - and the answer from the GM is not exactly in the spirit of that is it. It was a terrible reply whichever way you look at it, not to mention uninspiringly unoriginal.
  #2  
Old 03-19-2013, 05:44 AM
maverixdamighty maverixdamighty is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Llodd [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How do they compete for the mobs? They have to poopsock and 24/7 track/batphone
Which requires stupidly large guilds with enough able to log in at a moments notice.

Now there are other alternatives to that, but unfortunately they require server cooperation. Something to which this thread pertains - and the answer from the GM is not exactly in the spirit of that is it. It was a terrible reply whichever way you look at it, not to mention uninspiringly unoriginal.
people still talking about poopsocking aren't in touch with the current raid scene. Daimadoshi my only question for you is were you championing this when you were in IB and they had the server content on lockdown?
  #3  
Old 03-19-2013, 05:55 AM
finalgrunt finalgrunt is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
people still talking about poopsocking aren't in touch with the current raid scene. Daimadoshi my only question for you is were you championing this when you were in IB and they had the server content on lockdown?
If you've been around and close to me since I started playing on p99, you would know the answer.
Let's say I wasn't advocating IB's policy, even after the merge. Got almost booted for that few times [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] (You would be hard pressed to find any occurence of me killing a poopsocked target. Because it never happened). But I also knew that I couldn't do anything to prevent it. Hyper competition is/was backed up by the staff, and clearly stated they wouldn't do anything to change it. There are some players who don't mind going full hardcore. Do the math. It's left to players to come up with solutions.

Today, I believe there is an opportunity with TMO & FE, and I'm just trying to get a reasonable request through. It's now in the hands of TMO to shake a hand on this, and help this server becoming a better place (while leaving an overwhelming ratio of the content available for hyper competition). Which I've come to accept. I don't agree with it, but that's because my classic experience differs from others, due to the server's nature I played on.
__________________
Retired
Daimadoshi, Arch Magician <Divinity>
Kurth, Warlock <Divinity>
Kaska, Phantasmist <Divinity>
Fuam, Druid 57 <Divinity>
Willo, Cleric 54 <Divinity>
Last edited by finalgrunt; 03-19-2013 at 06:15 AM..
  #4  
Old 03-19-2013, 06:15 AM
maverixdamighty maverixdamighty is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by finalgrunt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you've been around and close to me since I started playing on p99, you would knew the answer.
Let's say I wasn't advocating IB's policy, even after the merge. Got almost booted for that few times [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] (You would be hard pressed to find any occurence of me killing a poopsocked target. Because it never happened). But I also knew that I couldn't do anything to prevent it. Hyper competition is/was backed up by the staff, and clearly stated they wouldn't do anything to change it. There are some players who don't mind going full hardcore. Do the math. It's left to players to come up with solutions.

Today, I believe there is an opportunity with TMO & FE, and I'm just trying to get a reasonable request through. It's now in the hands of TMO to shake a hand on this, and help this server becoming a better place (while leaving an overwhelming ratio of the content available for hyper competition). Which I've come to accept. I don't agree with it, but that's because my classic experience differs from others, due to the server's nature I played on.
Fair enough was an honest question. Didn't see these types of threads back in the day sponsored by IB is all.
  #5  
Old 03-19-2013, 01:26 PM
Llodd Llodd is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
people still talking about poopsocking aren't in touch with the current raid scene. Daimadoshi my only question for you is were you championing this when you were in IB and they had the server content on lockdown?
well sure. The current added variance has shaken things up bit, but you know full well it existed and would exist again if that was removed. way to miss the point tho, a+
  #6  
Old 03-19-2013, 02:29 PM
maverixdamighty maverixdamighty is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Llodd [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
well sure. The current added variance has shaken things up bit, but you know full well it existed and would exist again if that was removed. way to miss the point tho, a+
yes because talking about what used to be and is not any more makes an impact moving forward....F++++
  #7  
Old 03-19-2013, 04:21 PM
Llodd Llodd is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
yes because talking about what used to be and is not any more makes an impact moving forward....F++++
You're really going to roll with this?

How about not focusing on the "poopsock" part and go with the 24/7 batphone part. Then see where we end up ok? GO!
  #8  
Old 03-19-2013, 04:44 PM
maverixdamighty maverixdamighty is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Llodd [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're really going to roll with this?

How about not focusing on the "poopsock" part and go with the 24/7 batphone part. Then see where we end up ok? GO!
not everyone wakes up for raids. reaching.
  #9  
Old 03-20-2013, 05:28 AM
Llodd Llodd is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
not everyone wakes up for raids. reaching.
Still refusing to address the point I see.

Yes not everyone wakes up for raids - which is the exact reason why guilds have to be so damn large to compete. So long as enough wake up its all systems go.

Now take a small guild that can only raid within a certain window. What chance have they to get a raid target? Which is one of the main driving forces behind this whole thread.
  #10  
Old 03-20-2013, 03:54 AM
kotton05 kotton05 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,728
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Llodd [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're really going to roll with this?

How about not focusing on the "poopsock" part and go with the 24/7 batphone part. Then see where we end up ok? GO!
poopsock doesn't exist with current window....

as for removing fte, I don't think that'll happen, a shout maybe.

Current FTE rule is good imo.

Batphone/tracking is fine too, if you wanna see what a non variance target looks like port up to Sky on sunday late morning east and watch (Dojo).... TMO wont ever rotate that target, its an fte crap shoot all the way, rather annoying.

I think a week leaving one mob untracked could work tho. It wouldn't be like a once a month thing imo, more like special occasion. Also with FE in vp our attention will leave other targets walking the mortal planes for a bit longer. VP vs TMO isn't a quick raid. I think here in the near future a guild willing to step up and focus on one mob like draco/maestro/fay maybe will get it.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.