![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should there be a permanent IP ban option? | |||
| I agree. |
|
93 | 78.15% |
| I don't agree (tell us why below). |
|
26 | 21.85% |
| Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
Permanent IP bans are not a solution, period. Many have made the reasons quite clear in this thread.
I think people are REALLY overstating the RMT problem on the server. People who think prices are going up everywhere because of RMT are not thinking the situation all the way through. Honestly, RMT has very little impact on the economy. RMT isn't why Fungis are now 85k. I don't know what a good solution is for permanent bannings. I just don't think it is possible on an emulated server. At least on live servers you can require the person to pay for the game with each banning, but that never even stopped them. I just don't think the technology exists to permanently stop a person from creating an account and logging onto the server. The best practice is to probably simply delevel/strip all associated toons on banned accounts, as well as all mule accounts associated with them. At least force them to level up new characters and rebuild their wealth from scratch again. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
But RMT is the one thing that could shut the server down if Sony were to want to. Right now Sony's only weapon is burying the server owners in legal fees, as they aren't doing anything that is illegal. But if *someone* were to profit off the game via direct "pay for play" rewards, then that is more than enough leg to stand on to shut the server down. And for what it's worth, Smed loves that this server exists. So I'd prefer it if some D-Bags didn't give him a reason to change his stance...
__________________
Muteki - 57 Bard
Alva - 53 Monk Kallon - 58 Shaman | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
I totally am down with enforcing the total deletion of anybody associated with any sort of RMTing in any way. I never attempted to make any points about the drawbacks of RMT to the server. The primary point I wanted to make, was that RMT has absolutely nothing to do with rising prices in p1999's economy, and many people were implying that. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
New players wouldn't be able to buy the gear because they wouldn't have the plat, removing a large portion of the demand. I'm playing this game....on this server... a lot. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
If P1999 platinum had no real-world cash value, the motivation to farm platinum for the sole purpose of exchanging it for real-world cash would not exist. With this lack of motivation comes a lack of platinum-flooding. There's alot of things people would do in a virtual world if the virtual success can be converted into real-world success that they would never otherwise consider. | |||
|
Last edited by Loftus; 03-18-2013 at 08:27 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
The real issue is a huge amount of 60s sitting at level cap in Kunark era for far too long with nothing to do but accumulate plat every hour they play. The price fluctuations are that, and honestly, it isn't that bad when YOUR items that you can farm sell for more. It's supply and demand and nobody has to buy a thing from Sonaa and Sonaa certainly isn't monopolizing the market. I'll repeat this again: RMT is bad and we should be aggressively banning anyone who participates. Just trying to point out that some price increases are not due to RMT, it's due to the top-heavy server population. | |||
|
Last edited by skipdog; 03-19-2013 at 10:59 AM..
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|