Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-18-2013, 11:03 AM
AenarieFenninRo AenarieFenninRo is offline
Aviak

AenarieFenninRo's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 64
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If TMO and FE want to make a sincere effort they need to include some real targets in there. TMO needs to relinquish TrainCity. Again this is all moot until TMO plays ball.
I am taking your meaning of TrainCity to be VP... and being that we're talking about the guilds who have been getting no targets here, I don't know why this would happen unless they had sufficient raid force with VP keys.

I'm not saying no here, i'm simply stating that I dont see why this would be done. At the moment FE is making strides toward joining us in VP... trains and all... which will make that zone all the much more fun, but I would say for a minimum amount of success in VP you need at LEAST 20-25 raiders... NOT for just the targets, but anti-training etc. Can it be done with less, sure..

So by saying that TMO would have to give that up, you're effectively forcing a rotation on the top two guilds over the one zone that we would still be competing in, because... why?
  #2  
Old 03-18-2013, 11:10 AM
arsenalpow arsenalpow is offline
Planar Protector

arsenalpow's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,225
Default

TMO doesn't even need 99% of the loot in VP considering they offer up rots to anyone not in FE. Again VP isn't filled with invincible targets, 32k isn't enough HP to keep 24 relatively well geared raiders from dropping them as proven when TMO wasn't training us during their vacation.

TMO/FE could fight over PD and rotate the rest and then it's much less of a headache for all parties involved. Also with VP loot flowing I'd suspect FE wouldn't contest the rest of kunark as hard, trickle down economics.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood Hogan
The first thing you gotta' realize, brother, is this right here is the future of wrestling. You can call this the New World Order of Wrestling.
  #3  
Old 03-18-2013, 11:13 AM
maverixdamighty maverixdamighty is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
TMO doesn't even need 99% of the loot in VP considering they offer up rots to anyone not in FE. Again VP isn't filled with invincible targets, 32k isn't enough HP to keep 24 relatively well geared raiders from dropping them as proven when TMO wasn't training us during their vacation.

TMO/FE could fight over PD and rotate the rest and then it's much less of a headache for all parties involved. Also with VP loot flowing I'd suspect FE wouldn't contest the rest of kunark as hard, trickle down economics.
disagree. again FE is still a relatively new guild that still needs the loot from a majority of the kunark targets hence putting in the time/effort to get them. If we didn't need them I doubt you'd see us in farm mode like TMO. IMO again you are asking for way too much, which only hurts FE and helps TMO keep the gap in place.
  #4  
Old 03-18-2013, 11:16 AM
AenarieFenninRo AenarieFenninRo is offline
Aviak

AenarieFenninRo's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 64
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
TMO doesn't even need 99% of the loot in VP considering they offer up rots to anyone not in FE. Again VP isn't filled with invincible targets, 32k isn't enough HP to keep 24 relatively well geared raiders from dropping them as proven when TMO wasn't training us during their vacation.

TMO/FE could fight over PD and rotate the rest and then it's much less of a headache for all parties involved. Also with VP loot flowing I'd suspect FE wouldn't contest the rest of kunark as hard, trickle down economics.
Its great to shoot for the moon, but you dont often make it... read: interesting suggestion, but not likely to happen

As was brought up by Finalgrunt, start with smaller targets, work your way up. This is a reasonable approach, and has the potential to gain traction from both TMO and FE.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.