![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
Trak was.standing on top poop hill and ae'd our entire raid force because tmo engaged and subsequently brought trak to poop hill.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#5
|
|||
|
ae did not hit everyone on hill
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Cyrano trained trak a 2ndd time after the first time let's not leave that out. Was not intentional but it did happen, and no ill will toward cyrano mistakes happen.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Your right it didn't hit anyone who logged in after it went off
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#9
|
|||
|
So its ok to train a group logging in on your engage, because it is their fault they logged into trak being there? I thought you were responsible for your pulls, if trak was non aggrieved wandering back from a monk running him out of lair and he aggrod onto a raid force sitting on bill, this still constitutes a train. Tmo engageand kill trak its different the minute tmo wipes or calls of engage and the engage resulted in negative impact to Fe raid force it is raid interference.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Bad analogy. How bout bank robbers hide money in innocent persons car, cops find money and shoot innocent family. Cops then give money back to bank robbers. Innocent family blaims bank robbers because they started the whole fiasco.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|