Drama

[Stepy]

"1. I am bound at king."
OK, I would guess you would be camping king for loot since you plan of doing the rinse and repeat method, rather for cash or guildies.

"3. I let the spawn re pop fully because I didn't expect the m2h to pop and wanted to leave them with some mobs to kill in case it didn't."

This is a little more interesting to me, either you were giving up the camp and wanted to make sure it was full pop so they would have to work for it. You prefer a challenge and wanted a full spawn so you could continue to rely on the charm and zone strat?
This particular statement of your leads me to believe you were planing on leaving and wanted it to be full spawn first and changed your mind when you saw named.
Having several boys this is a common practice when they have to share something they do not give up so willingly.

[Shewz]

Uhh, mobs at the king camp are fairly sparse in my experience. They were a full group, they had plenty of lull power, I figured they would want the xp and the entertainment of killing a full spawn. Sorry? Read the original deal.

[Skope]

Originally Posted by Stepy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"1. I am bound at king."
OK, I would guess you would be camping king for loot since you plan of doing the rinse and repeat method, rather for cash or guildies.

"3. I let the spawn re pop fully because I didn't expect the m2h to pop and wanted to leave them with some mobs to kill in case it didn't."

This is a little more interesting to me, either you were giving up the camp and wanted to make sure it was full pop so they would have to work for it. You prefer a challenge and wanted a full spawn so you could continue to rely on the charm and zone strat?
This particular statement of your leads me to believe you were planing on leaving and wanted it to be full spawn first and changed your mind when you saw named.
Having several boys this is a common practice when they have to share something they do not give up so willingly.

Yea, considering he had such a rough time he had to zone (or at least zone to make it easier) when you don't have to zone and then actually wait for the repops to then make it harder on himself? The whole thing is a mess, and i think it was a matter of both miscommunication and a misunderstanding from both parties, but w/e. These things happen all the time, it just so happens there's a mithril 2hander involved that sparked this debate.

Either way it's done, dude just got a 10k item from my guildie who would have been using it even though he lost a roll and proceeds to rant about how we have bad attitudes. Take your sword, sell it. Nobody cares

[Treats]

Originally Posted by Stepy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is a little more interesting to me, either you were giving up the camp and wanted to make sure it was full pop so they would have to work for it. You prefer a challenge and wanted a full spawn so you could continue to rely on the charm and zone strat?
This particular statement of your leads me to believe you were planing on leaving and wanted it to be full spawn first and changed your mind when you saw named.
Having several boys this is a common practice when they have to share something they do not give up so willingly.

Just a simple case of greed on the part of the group. Obviously the group (and later the Guild Leadership of Divinity) knew they were doing something wrong (Camp rules or Ethics or whatever) if they let the Enchanter roll for the sword and then later gave it back to him. All was fine and dandy with the group waiting and letting all the frogs spawn until the King pops with the sword and they go into whore mode with "OMG WE HAVE TO HAVE THE LEWTZ ITS OUR CAMP NOW IF WE BREAK THE SPAWN"

To the above poster...Are you just a complete fucking idiot? Do you know of the spell "Pacify" or "Calm"? Yes he was planning on leaving because THATS THE FUCKING AGREEMENT HE MADE WITH THEM.

An Enchanter can kill King/PH/roamer in the room and nothing else then afk for 25 minutes until the next spawn. If an Enchanter binds near the zone out yes he can zone out and be back within 20 seconds depending on load times. I didn't think this was some super secret strategy but obviously some of you have no clue whatsoever or take the time to figure it out before you post your stupid comments.

[President]

Originally Posted by Treats [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just a simple case of greed on the part of the group. Obviously the group (and later the Guild Leadership of Divinity) knew they were doing something wrong (Camp rules or Ethics or whatever) if they let the Enchanter roll for the sword and then later gave it back to him. All was fine and dandy with the group waiting and letting all the frogs spawn until the King pops with the sword and they go into whore mode with "OMG WE HAVE TO HAVE THE LEWTZ ITS OUR CAMP NOW IF WE BREAK THE SPAWN"

To the above poster...Are you just a complete fucking idiot? Do you know of the spell "Pacify" or "Calm"? Yes he was planning on leaving because THATS THE FUCKING AGREEMENT HE MADE WITH THEM.

An Enchanter can kill King/PH/roamer in the room and nothing else then afk for 25 minutes until the next spawn. If an Enchanter binds near the zone out yes he can zone out and be back within 20 seconds depending on load times. I didn't think this was some super secret strategy but obviously some of you have no clue whatsoever or take the time to figure it out before you post your stupid comments.

Well.. Thanks for that post... Anyone with a brain have anything to add to this discussion?