Forceful Entry wipes pathetically to CT on a Free anc Clear Engage with 45 people

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

did it matter if it took 10 minutes if you had 5 people in zone when FE engaged it?

5 people when FE tagged it... not when engaged.

[maverixdamighty]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

5 people when FE tagged it... not when engaged.

post a ss of your raid force when fe had it engaged then.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

post a ss of your raid force when fe had it engaged then.

Lol i dont take SS's however, Its of no importance. If you think we would wipe to Fay you shouldnt have kited the mobs 2 minutes out of the way. You should have let us tag it and wipe to it. However, its Fay... 1 group mob.

[maverixdamighty]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol i dont take SS's however, Its of no importance. If you think we would wipe to Fay you shouldnt have kited the mobs 2 minutes out of the way. You should have let us tag it and wipe to it. However, its Fay... 1 group mob.

maybe he kited around where he thought your 5 man raid was so we wouldn't get accused of training? fay died before you guys were there, move on.

[Relapse2]

typical TmO can't beat em cry to gm to get them suspended

[Tanthallas]

Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

post a ss of your raid force when fe had it engaged then.

You had 5 people in the zone from when Fay was pulled to when Fay died.

[Rhambuk]

you could say, for the sake of argument, that knowing another raid was incoming and kiting it way out of its normal area for any reason could be raid interference.

[maverixdamighty]

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you could say, for the sake of argument, that knowing another raid was incoming and kiting it way out of its normal area for any reason could be raid interference.

that makes no sense if you engage it before they are even there. so if you are the only raid in zone and you kite a mob around out of boredom it's "raid interference" if someone petitions? Look at the picture it's not that far out of the way anyways.

[Ele]

Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

that makes no sense if you engage it before they are even there. so if you are the only raid in zone and you kite a mob around out of boredom it's "raid interference" if someone petitions? Look at the picture it's not that far out of the way anyways.

Basically.

Q: What about a raid mob being indefinitely kited or occupied?
A: It is now against server policy to indefinitely kite, or otherwise keep occupied, a raid mob without intention of bringing it to your raid camp. You either bring it to your raid, die, or zone out. Obvious stall-kiting of a raid mob, especially in situations to prevent engagement by another guild, will result in disciplinary actions against the kiter's account, and possibly their raid/guild leadership.

[Rhambuk]

I'm just trying to understand both sides, I definitely get your plight. Those 5 tmo probably could've engaged him maybe not beat him but at least survived until more of their force arrived, I'm assuming they were extremely well geared. Whether they planned to engage with 5 or not doesn't matter as soon as the mob was being kited, and not engaged, it was stalling.

I don't agree with immediately petitioning and calling it stalling/raid interference on a technicality but when you make winning everything you have to win.