Drama

[soup]

Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let me help you understand:





Step 1: Group wipes, enchanter invokes rule 1 & 4 to claim the camp.

Step 2: Cut a hole in a box.

Step 3: Camp belongs to enchanter. No one is disputing this, even the group leader.

Step 4: Put your junk in that box.

Step 5: Enchanter zones, group invokes rule 1 to claim the camp, just as was done to them.

(Note: rule 1 does not have an arbitrary time limit that you are now "making up" to suit your argument here. They could also invoke rule 4, but we've decided we'll even give the OP benefit of the doubt and assume he could have demonstrated the ability to hold the camp had he killed the pet and re-charmed, or mez/memblurred the pet, waited for the mob to regain HP, and re-charmed. However, in this case, rule 1 was enough for the group to claim the camp.)

Step 6: Make her open the box.

Step 7: Camp belongs to group. "Deal" made to give him 1 PH/spawn is now void.

Enchanter didn't invoke shit. He said he could be a dick and do xxxxx, but instead he'll just kill one more and leave if that is agreed to be fair, which it was.

[YendorLootmonkey]

Originally Posted by soup [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Enchanter didn't invoke shit. He said he could be a dick and do xxxxx, but instead he'll just kill one more and leave if that is agreed to be fair, which it was.

Yup, during the time he had rights to the camp. Those rights expired when he zoned, per rule 1. Unless you can show how someone not in a zone can simultaneously retain a presence at a camp in that zone. Which you can't.

Whether you agree with those rules is irrelevant to how they are applied to determine who had the rights to the camp at each point in this situation we're discussing.