Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-30-2009, 10:52 PM
eqravenprince eqravenprince is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,472
Default

Just did a class count using /who all 5 50 class:

Cleric 20
Necro 19
Magician 18
Shaman 18
Druid 16
Rogue 14
Enchanter 12
Paladin 12
Warrior 11
Bard 11
SK 9
Monk 9
Wizard 8
Ranger 1
  #2  
Old 12-01-2009, 01:55 AM
Widan Widan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 559
Default

Why are wizards so low? I would think they would be very desirable for groups that have a pet as the main tank. Yes a few more wizards might be /anon so they don't get bothered for ports but probably no more than 2-3 more than other classes.
  #3  
Old 12-01-2009, 02:36 AM
Halladar Halladar is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 95
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Widan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why are wizards so low? I would think they would be very desirable for groups that have a pet as the main tank. Yes a few more wizards might be /anon so they don't get bothered for ports but probably no more than 2-3 more than other classes.
I think they are going to be a lot more attractive come kunark for sure. They have some awful big zones there.

Part of it is mages are much easier to play, and honestly are much stronger than wizards for a long time. It isn't until maybe the 40's that I think you might say I'd rather have a wizard than a mage in a group, except for ports. And stuns too I guess.

Well on live during 1999 you might have said that. Not sure what is going on with the pets at higher levels here.
Last edited by Halladar; 12-01-2009 at 02:40 AM..
  #4  
Old 12-01-2009, 06:14 AM
Tovok Tovok is offline
Scrawny Gnoll

Tovok's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Halladar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think they are going to be a lot more attractive come kunark for sure. They have some awful big zones there.

Part of it is mages are much easier to play, and honestly are much stronger than wizards for a long time. It isn't until maybe the 40's that I think you might say I'd rather have a wizard than a mage in a group, except for ports. And stuns too I guess.

Well on live during 1999 you might have said that. Not sure what is going on with the pets at higher levels here.
Wizards will get more in demand as the raid targets get bigger. I was a wizard on live. As I understand it, mages had a few problems on raids there:

- pets broke mez
- pets died to AE
- mages couldn't do damage to target with nukes due to resists
- mages couldn't sustain nuking because they didn't have concussion

Meanwhile, a wizard could always find a damage type that would work with the target, we could manage agro with concussion, and we even got bane spells with Velious.

I love the mage class, but I have no illusions about the long term viability remaining as it is now on p99.
  #5  
Old 12-01-2009, 06:27 AM
Tovok Tovok is offline
Scrawny Gnoll

Tovok's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 29
Default

Just remembered one other thing that factors into this. Pathing and running. If mobs run away here like they did on live, snare is huge. If they don't, it obviously won't be. I don't necessarily take mobs running as a given, since in Shard of Dalaya they definitely didn't for the most part. The low level mobs seem to run here just fine, though.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.