![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Nocte: 60 Cleric
Duchess: 60 Rogue Bizarro Nalkin: 55 Gnecromancer | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
The other day I was grouped with a warrior named Warrenz in Sol B who was using executioner's axe and couldn't hold agro worth a penny. Someone recommended he buy some 20plat lariats as soon as he could so he could tank better and he rage quit on our group.
A lot of warriors just fail to understand the limitations of their class. Also, if you're a dps player it takes a little bit of adjustment getting used to having a warrior tank for your group because if you're used to SKs/Pals you're used to being able to start damage a lot faster and more freely. Jilena summed it up pretty well. Even well geared warriors are inferior to pals and sks in exp groups. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
Regards, Mg
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
30 starting dex, have dex as your primary stat, and follow up with agi/ac/sta/hp gear, and 2 lariats. Gtg. Haste and you're a stunlock aggro whore.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Yeah, I agree with the general sentiment of this thread, as a Bard no less. I haven't experienced it that often, but it has happened that I took way too much aggro when a warrior was the tank, and had to have it explained to me that (untwinked) warriors in those situations need to build a bit of aggro before the bard can just charge in like a moron.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|