ban on assault weapons and 10 round clip limit

[Humerox]

Here's the correct fucking answer, gents. The Constitution isn't clear and the courts haven't specifically addressed the question yet.

When they do, you guys might have something to bitch about. Until then,you're full of shit.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Humerox [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here's the correct fucking answer, gents. The Constitution isn't clear and the courts haven't specifically addressed the question yet.

When they do, you guys might have something to bitch about. Until then,you're full of shit.

and you're full of shit.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

and you're full of shit.

They said arms as in all arms, if they wanted people to have inferior arms compared to the standing army, they'd have stated it like that.


Aka, you can stfu.

[Autotune]

This isn't the bible where you try to interpret the words and phrases to benefit your ideals and how you think things should be or should have been.

[Humerox]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This isn't the bible where you try to interpret the words and phrases to benefit your ideals and how you think things should be or should have been.

Lol...wut?

[Resheph]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They said arms as in all arms, if they wanted people to have inferior arms compared to the standing army, they'd have stated it like that.

Untrained civilians having the same weaponry as trained military soldiers in today's army is plain stupid. Having single-shot pistols is one thing, having 200-round magazines for an automatic weapon, plastic explosives, RPGs and tanks as a civilian is just asking for trouble.

The military has changed a lot in 200+ years... people need to change their mindsets as well.