stop bringing up the founding fathers in gun arguments

[Humerox]

Originally Posted by vaylorie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There you go smart guy. Fixed that for you.

I see you've come to terms with it. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by patriot1776 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

mexico has among the strictest gun control laws in the world and is in the middle of a fucking civil war.

Funded with guns and dirty money supplied by us over drugs supplied to us...but that's another argument.

http://www.snopes.com/crime/statistics/ausguns.asp

Nice linkage, Gloine. Whether or not it could happen here is something worth shooting for. The affirmation of skewed statistical data regarding attempts to overcome the Aussie argument is nice, tho.

Jon Stewart made a pretty good presentation a few days ago...

[vaylorie]

Originally Posted by Humerox [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I see you've come to terms with it. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There was never a debate regarding some gun restrictions being legal/constitutional. The debate we previously had, in which you suffered an embarrassing defeat mind you, was regarding gun laws equating to a decrease in violent crime. As has been proven on this forum a few times now, restricting guns does not reduce overall violent crime.

[Lexical]

Originally Posted by vaylorie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As has been proven on this forum a few times now, restricting guns does not reduce overall violent crime.

Actually no. ITT there was a wide array of statistical analysis that support that hypothesis, but it is far from proven. There are many other factors that can tie into the equation, but there is a far amount of evidence that support this claim.