stop bringing up the founding fathers in gun arguments

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by vaylorie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, I'm telling you that gun bans don't reduce crime as is shown in the data. Thank you for making my point.




So you wouldn't expect to see a significant / marked decrease in violent crimes if guns were indeed the problem?

Also, of course I used a localized statistic. If I wanted to show a trend of the entire US, I would use data representative of the entire US. If I wanted to show the effect that a local gun ban in D.C. had, should I use 1) D.C. data or 2) All US data? If you can't figure that out that you are even stupider than your posts make you seem.

One more. If I wanted to see the impact of a gun ban in Britain, would I use 1) official government crime statistics for the region in question (i.e. Britain), or 2) worldwide violent crime statistics.

Thank you for playing.

Your data didn't actually show that.

So basically, you are completely lost, you have no point, and you are mad?

Your data wasn't representative of anything you were trying to prove. There was 0 correlation.

Good job you succeeded in demonstrating to the educated here that you are clueless. I am sure patriot and hatelores will eat up your pretty graphs though. Good company you keep haha.

[vaylorie]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your data didn't actually show that.

So basically, you are completely lost, you have no point, and you are mad?

Your data wasn't representative of anything you were trying to prove. There was 0 correlation.

Good job you succeeded in demonstrating to the educated here that you are clueless. I am sure patriot and hatelores will eat up your pretty graphs though. Good company you keep haha.

So I take it this is your way of saying that I was right and you were wrong? How embarrassing for you. Good luck in your future endeavors, i wish you well.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by vaylorie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So I take it this is your way of saying that I was right and you were wrong? How embarrassing for you. Good luck in your future endeavors, i wish you well.

Apparently, reading comprehension isn't your thing as well. Nothing you have said is backed up with evidence. None of the "evidence" you presented supported your arguments. So yes you win at being clueless, moronic, and delusional. Good job?

[vaylorie]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

yes you win

Way to handle it like a gentleman. Bravo sir.

[patriot1776]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your data didn't actually show that.

So basically, you are completely lost, you have no point, and you are mad?

Your data wasn't representative of anything you were trying to prove. There was 0 correlation.

Good job you succeeded in demonstrating to the educated here that you are clueless. I am sure patriot and hatelores will eat up your pretty graphs though. Good company you keep haha.

actually he shut your case that gun ban would reduce crime down completely. thanks for playin

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by patriot1776 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

actually he shut your case that gun ban would reduce crime down completely. thanks for playin

I never said anything about guns being the cause of all crime. Apparently, ignorance loves company too.