Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-17-2010, 12:56 PM
Toony Toony is offline
Kobold

Toony's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 195
Default

Drilling at 5k feet presents problems shallow (500') drilling doesn't.

Any guesses as to why they were drilling at 5k?
  #2  
Old 06-17-2010, 01:17 PM
Taxi Taxi is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2010
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toony [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Drilling at 5k feet presents problems shallow (500') drilling doesn't.

Any guesses as to why they were drilling at 5k?
Theyre running out of Oil along shorelines and on land. Thats not a scientific affirmation, thats what i could muster from reading recent articles about the spill here and there.

I understand its the same reason why theres an industry in Alberta about extracting oil from bitumous sands (spelling).
  #3  
Old 06-17-2010, 01:30 PM
Toony Toony is offline
Kobold

Toony's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taxi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Theyre running out of Oil along shorelines and on land. Thats not a scientific affirmation, thats what i could muster from reading recent articles about the spill here and there.

I understand its the same reason why theres an industry in Alberta about extracting oil from bitumous sands (spelling).
"Running out" is a relative term, but yeah it isn't getting any easier to drill shallow. There are still relatively large amounts of oil inland, but environmental concerns typically outweigh rights to those wells. One contributing factor to why they were out there is the 'Deep Water Royalty Relief Act'.

Ya know when you think about it, which is an easier accident to address, one on land or one at 5k feet deep?
  #4  
Old 06-17-2010, 01:48 PM
Excision Rottun Excision Rottun is offline
Fire Giant

Excision Rottun's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alberta
Posts: 521
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taxi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I understand its the same reason why theres an industry in Alberta about extracting oil from bitumous sands (spelling).
The reason they are extracting from the Athabasca Oilsands, is that it contains about 1.7 trillion barrels of bitumen in-place, comparable in magnitude to the world's total proven reserves of conventional petroleum.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean
Shut the fuck up. Seriously.
  #5  
Old 06-17-2010, 01:56 PM
Taxi Taxi is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2010
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Excision Rottun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The reason they are extracting from the Athabasca Oilsands, is that it contains about 1.7 trillion barrels of bitumen in-place, comparable in magnitude to the world's total proven reserves of conventional petroleum.
Ahh, i see.

Ive heard it said that its responsible for releasing more climate warming gas than any other methods, but not a scientific opinion here either.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.