Raid Rules Alternative

[Pyrocat]

Originally Posted by Jify [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's pretty extreme. I'd promote a deleveling of 5 levels, to bring them below the planar requirement. But no perma banning. There have been times when I was 100% sure we were in the right, and GMs ruled against us. (not to say they are inhuman and always make the correct decisions, but we must abide by them)

I don't think deleveling is a solution GMs would want. It's very non-classic and guilds can PL whoever took the fall anyway.

Temp bans of 14-30 days sounds good, and I like Xzerions (I think) idea of needing an officer to vouch for whomever got a GM involved, who would share the weight of their ban.

[Dumesh Uhl'Belk]

Originally Posted by Pyrocat [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't think deleveling is a solution GMs would want. It's very non-classic and guilds can PL whoever took the fall anyway.

Temp bans of 14-30 days sounds good, and I like Xzerions (I think) idea of needing an officer to vouch for whomever got a GM involved, who would share the weight of their ban.

Perhaps not, this is the one area that takes the most input from the server devs. I'm not sure what the ideal penalty is. I just know it must be harsh and the devs must be ok with handing it out however many times it takes to get the message out to the server community. I have a feeling that if it is harsh enough it shouldn't have to be done more than 6-12 times before people quit looking to break the rules to get what they want.