Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Resolved Issues

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-14-2010, 03:48 PM
Aeolwind Aeolwind is offline
Developer

Aeolwind's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Watauga, TN
Posts: 1,641
Send a message via AIM to Aeolwind Send a message via MSN to Aeolwind Send a message via Yahoo to Aeolwind
Default

Yeah, memblur has never been a no-fail situation. Even the GM Memblur lol.
__________________
I have walked my way since the beginning of time. Sometimes I give, sometimes I take & it is mine to know which and when.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nilbog
If all the polls I have done up until now fully counted, you would be playing on some abomination of a PVP server with 2-10 boxing based on votes from people named xcm234nv and adfa234.
  #2  
Old 06-14-2010, 03:58 PM
guineapig guineapig is offline
Planar Protector

guineapig's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,028
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeolwind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah, memblur has never been a no-fail situation. Even the GM Memblur lol.
Wow, now that is surprising!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Server chat is for civil conversation. Personal attacks/generally being confrontational will not be tolerated.
  #3  
Old 06-14-2010, 06:38 PM
Dersk Dersk is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeolwind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah, memblur has never been a no-fail situation. Even the GM Memblur lol.
1st, it's how the spell works on live and has done so for years. I can't find any comments or patch notes saying it has ever changed.

Quote:
http://web.archive.org/web/200105050...asp?SpellID=20
A mesmerised monster also has around a 95% chance of having its Hate List wiped, similiar to the effects of Memory Blur. Just make sure you are beyond the frenzy range when it wears off to ensure success.
The difference here between their 95% chance and my claim of 100% chance can be explained by refreshing mez, which doesn't mem blur, or assist agro. That same bit is listed on the spell information for all the mezes.

Quote:
http://web.archive.org/web/200105050...sp?SpellID=115
Now, if I Entrance/Enthrall/Mesmerize a mob and leave, it *NEVER* comes after me
http://web.archive.org/web/200405282...et/spells4.htm

The runes said "wipe hate list", not % chance. That's a bit vague, but no where have I found evidence of mez being unable to wipe the hate list.

The blur is a no-fail situation, and I'm kinda surprised someone could have played an enchanter and not notice that. The only limitation that I've ever been able to verify is that a refreshed mez will not blur, but alternating mezes, i.e. using enthrall to overwrite a mesmerize, will properly blur.

In response to tests showing 100% blur rate from '04:
Quote:
http://www.therunes.net/forums/viewt...hp?f=15&t=5300

Guard E'Brona is level 15. If I recall correctly, before level 35, monsters are highly, if not completely, susceptible to memory blur. After 35, memory blur doesn't work that reliably.
Last edited by Dersk; 06-14-2010 at 06:54 PM..
  #4  
Old 06-15-2010, 10:08 AM
Malrubius Malrubius is offline
Fire Giant

Malrubius's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 910
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dersk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The blur is a no-fail situation, and I'm kinda surprised someone could have played an enchanter and not notice that.
Memblur was definitely NOT a no-fail situation in classic. I definitely remember times when I needed to recast it (General Bragmur for the 8th shawl comes to mind) when the first blur didn't wipe.

Your quote above from therunes even says "After 35, memory blur doesn't work that reliably. "

If I had to guess, I would say it worked about 90% of the time (post 35 anyway - never really played with it before that).


Mez could and did wipe the hate list as well (in Classic). In fact, I recall that it *very often* wiped the hate list in Classic, but not as reliably as Memblur.
  #5  
Old 06-15-2010, 12:41 PM
Dersk Dersk is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malrubius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Memblur was definitely NOT a no-fail situation in classic. I definitely remember times when I needed to recast it (General Bragmur for the 8th shawl comes to mind) when the first blur didn't wipe.
General Bragmur is level 40, which is relevantly higher than 35. My original post, the posts I have quoted, and the current workings on EQlive apply to mobs under level 35, though I'll admit the older castersrealm info doesn't appear to know enough to clarify that distinction. I know that the memory blur effects of mezzes are not 100% reliable above level 35. I avoided listing it every single time because I really didn't want to be too repetitive hah.

As far as the memory blur spell, I have never tested it on EQlive nor have I accessed it on P1999, so I can't really comment one way or the other. I was attempting to describe the memory blur effect of mesmerize spells. I do apologize if that got confusing.

If what I've given isn't appropriate for verifying the specific mechanics I'm describing, then simply let me know what would be considered sufficient proof, so I know what to look for. Hell, if I have to go to WeGame and record a video of me mezzing level 1 mobs on EQlive then I'll consider it.
Last edited by Dersk; 06-15-2010 at 12:44 PM..
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.