Vox PUG starting 6/14/10

[Aadill]

Originally Posted by pickled_heretic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what some see as an inadequate set of rules right now, and this thread captures that frustration pretty well.

Until the rules are changed, not following them puts you in just as worse of a position. I'm all for revolution but this is going to turn into a GM-involved thing fairly quick, assuming they even want to log in until after Vox is dead.

[pickled_heretic]

Originally Posted by Aadill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Until the rules are changed, not following them puts you in just as worse of a position. I'm all for revolution but this is going to turn into a GM-involved thing fairly quick, assuming they even want to log in until after Vox is dead.

I think there's some double standards going on in general. It's okay, for instance, for DA/IB to play weasel words over rules with one another, but not when one or more individuals tries to do the same in relationship to the establishment?

[Aadill]

Originally Posted by pickled_heretic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think there's some double standards going on in general. It's okay, for instance, for DA/IB to play weasel words over rules with one another, but not when one or more individuals tries to do the same in relationship to the establishment?

There have not been any 'weasel words' being tossed about between the guilds. If anything, the rules are being followed to the letter as closely as possible. Granted, this is through my perception and I may be wrong on this.

If any one does try to weasel through the rules I'll gladly point them to this thread and your post as a call out [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[pickled_heretic]

Originally Posted by Aadill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There have not been any 'weasel words' being tossed about between the guilds. If anything, the rules are being followed to the letter as closely as possible. Granted, this is through my perception and I may be wrong on this.

If any one does try to weasel through the rules I'll gladly point them to this thread and your post as a call out [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You misunderstand. The literal interpretation that both guilds have adopted of the rules is basically the same as abacab interpreting the rules literally to mean (mostly) only guilds, right? You're advocating a literal interpretation and strict enforcement, yes? how is what abacab proposing not also a literal interpretation of the rules?