And I raaaaaan, I raaaan so far awaaaayyyy

[Tanthallas]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

1. Drui gets DT'd

2. Scorchin gets DT'd

3. TMO engages

4. FE sits on thumbs

FTFY

1. Drui gets DT'd. CT resets. The aggro log gets wiped because CT has not been killed on this encounter. Hence Drui is not on the encounter log which spreads from the first to be on the aggro list of CT in the same encounter as he is killed.

2. Scorchin aggro's CT, and thus a new encounter log forms the second that Scorchin aggro's CT.

3. TMO engages CT.

4. Scorchin dies.

5. TMO kills CT.

6. The encounter logs show Scorchin as having FTE because he was the first on the aggro list of the particular encounter in which CT was killed.

7. Alarti attempts to reduce the thread about the interpretation of these facts to a shit throwing contest by consistently posing them in a confused and nonsensical manner.

8. Zeelot gives Alarti top shelf dog food to reward a job well done.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Tanthallas [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

1. Drui gets DT'd. CT resets. The aggro log gets wiped because CT has not been killed on this encounter. Hence Drui is not on the encounter log which spreads from the first to be on the aggro list of CT in the same encounter as he is killed.

2. Scorchin aggro's CT, and thus a new encounter log forms the second that Scorchin aggro's CT.

2.00000000000001. TMO engages CT.

2.00000000000002. Scorchin dies.

3. TMO kills CT.

4. The encounter logs show Scorchin as having FTE because he was the first on the aggro list of the particular encounter in which CT was killed.

5. Sorchin clearly wasn't trying to engage CT

6. No other member of FE was on the aggro log or anywhere near CT

Just helping you clear up information